Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(98,539 posts)
6. From your link.
Sun Sep 14, 2014, 07:01 PM
Sep 2014
Grapski comments, “At that point in time – the Police Department DID NOT produce the record because of the lawsuit – but was ready and willing to use that process of DELAY to keep denying production. This was soon to change.” It changed because Grapski became involved. On Sunday, Aug. 17, he submitted his own public records request, adopting a much more no-nonsense tone:

THIS IS NOT a request for records of the INVESTIGATION into this matter. Thus if you respond to this that these records are not available at this time because of an ongoing investigation — you will be VIOLATING THE LAW and as this is notice to you that there is no such exemption pertaining to INCIDENT REPORTS in Missouri law — if you make such a claim — your violation will be KNOWING and WILLFUL — and will constitute not only an offense under Missouri Law but will constitute a knowing and willful violation of your OATH OF OFFICE.


Okay so let me get this straight "law enforcement" are breaking the "law', while continuing to harass and arrest protesters, that are acting peacefully. Their response as we all well know was a militaristic shock and awe. At the same time they are doing all they can to harbor a criminal. They are protecting their own and have not a care for the citizens of Ferguson.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R for more visibility. nt Mnemosyne Sep 2014 #1
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Sep 2014 #2
"quite quite suspicious" Yes. Quite. LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #3
The cover is unabated tooeyeten Sep 2014 #4
K&R for exposure. nt avebury Sep 2014 #5
From your link. sheshe2 Sep 2014 #6
Correct malaise Sep 2014 #9
hi sheshe, have you seen this ---> napkinz Sep 2014 #13
I saw a short clip of it. sheshe2 Sep 2014 #14
Incredible doublespeak coming out of the FPD- bookmarking! bettyellen Sep 2014 #7
I'd certainly contribute: Live and Learn Sep 2014 #8
Help, Police father founding Sep 2014 #10
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Sep 2014 #11
Someone, maybe Grapski himself, needs to justiceischeap Sep 2014 #12
It's already happening sheshe2 Sep 2014 #15
And just where *is* Darren Wilson, anyway? starroute Sep 2014 #16
T'would be nice Plucketeer Sep 2014 #20
k and most assuredly R for this very necessary thread! niyad Sep 2014 #17
Obvious to me who has the power and it is oldandhappy Sep 2014 #18
It's interesting how brazen they are in the face of the DOJ investigation. We KNOW sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #19
Ugh! blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #21
K&R secondwind Sep 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ferguson’s massive cover-...»Reply #6