Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

intaglio

(8,170 posts)

5. Anti-Union? Yes, but legally so

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Thu Apr 12, 2012, 03:34 PM

Apr 2012

A shareholder and icon of the company is at liberty to appear in the advertisement. He is also the most recognisable face associated with that company.

None of these things imply that he is breaking US law

He may be a Dick Branson, sorry Sir Dick Branson, for opposing union rights but he is allowed to be a Dick or a Richard (rhyming slang)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Richard Branson is a anti-union liar. [View all] Archae Apr 2012 OP

ttt Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #1

ttt? Archae Apr 2012 #2

To The Top Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #4

A lying anti-union billionaire, what a shock! n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #3

Anti-Union? Yes, but legally so intaglio Apr 2012 #5

I like the way you speak! just1voice Apr 2012 #6