General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I know I'm whining, but I wish corporal punishment had been criminalized a few decades earlier. [View all]Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Parental freedom to raise their kids in a reasonable fashion is easy to defend.
The anti-spanking argument goes like this: A parent should never engage in behavior that hurts his or her children. Spanking is a behavior that hurts children. Therefore parents should not engage in spanking their children.
So, the flaw in the argument becomes exposed when you replace the phrase "engage in spanking" with words such as "inoculate against disease", "receive dental care", "play with young pets who may scratch or bite", "learn to ride a bike", etc.
The only way to argue against this is to either change the premise or redefine the terms.
The real reason you are unhappy is that my arguments make sense, whereas your arguments are little more than cries of "What about the children!? What about the children!?" A tired argument that we have all heard repeatedly from the Christofascist arm of the Republican Party.
http://health.usnews.com/health-news/articles/2014/04/29/spanking-may-be-more-common-than-parents-admit
Somehow I suspect you might mistake freedom with the right to force your opinions into other's private lives.