Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,835 posts)
10. First of all - an apology - I never intended to write anything that suggested you (or anyone here)
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:21 AM
Sep 2014

would not care about child abuse.

I was trying to make 2 points:
1) By virtue of who he is -- this becomes an issue that really is bigger than him. I agree with your comments on how it should be handled. My concern was that his team supporting him AS he said he did nothing wrong could send a very bad message.

2) There are always many many major causes that need action - and I have a problem with the relatively common "Why are you worrying about X, when Y and Z are more important. Especially when X may often be some well meaning legislation that fixes a small problem for some or things like collecting food for food banks rather than addressing the economic structure that leads so many to need the food banks.

I hope that Peterson's actions will start a discussion on child abuse, just as the actions of others have led to a discussion of domestic violence. I don't think a discussion will end either, but it could lead to some change in what is considered unacceptable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What I want to know, is w...»Reply #10