Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Strange Case Of A Father Who Sued The Obama Administration To Keep His Daughters From Getting... [View all]

Providing two college-age women with health insurance that covers birth control, according to an attorney for Missouri state Rep. Paul Joseph Wieland (R) and his wife Teresa, is the equivalent of giving your children free access to a stocked unlocked liquor cabinet. In case the judges hearing his clients case did not find that analogy particularly compelling, he also compared birth control to pornography.
If the Wielands lawsuit succeeds, they will win the right to deny their three daughters two of whom are adults a health insurance policy that covers contraception. Wieland and his wife claim that they cannot provide, fund or in any way be a participant in the provision of health care coverage for contraception, sterilization, abortions or abortifacient drugs and devices, such as Plan B, ella, and copper IUDs, or related education and counseling, without violating their sincerely-held religious beliefs.
The Wieland family is insured through a health plan Missouri offers to its employees. They allege that Missouri expanded this plan in 2013 to include contraceptive care in order to comply with federal rules that require employer-provided plans to include this care. The gist of their argument is that they should be allowed to continue to remain on Missouris health plan for state employees, but that they should also be offered a special carve out so that their plan does not cover contraception and other reproductive services that Paul and Teresa Wieland find objectionable.
More here: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/11/3566209/the-strange-case-of-a-father-who-sued-the-obama-administration-to-keep-his-daughters-from-having-sex/
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Strange Case Of A Father Who Sued The Obama Administration To Keep His Daughters From Getting... [View all]
Playinghardball
Sep 2014
OP
They cannot speak for their adult children. Let's hope that those 2 daughters
sinkingfeeling
Sep 2014
#1
So this family does not want their insurance plan to have access to birth control. What about all
jwirr
Sep 2014
#4
Exactly. We could all find some reason we want out insurance company to do it our way. That
jwirr
Sep 2014
#7
You know, maybe if they were putting their nose near other people's "business"...
politicat
Sep 2014
#24
In light of the Hobby Lobby decision I don't see how the court can deny the parents,
cheapdate
Sep 2014
#27
I don't either. I thought you had to show direct harm to be a party to a lawsuit.
cheapdate
Sep 2014
#40