General Discussion

TlalocW

(15,675 posts)

2. I look forward to hearing about his daughters getting knocked up

Reply to Playinghardball (Original post)

Tue Sep 16, 2014, 02:04 PM

Sep 2014

And moving back in with him (or not moving out).

TlalocW

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Strange Case Of A Father Who Sued The Obama Administration To Keep His Daughters From Getting... [View all] Playinghardball Sep 2014 OP

They cannot speak for their adult children. Let's hope that those 2 daughters sinkingfeeling Sep 2014 #1

it doesn't say the daughters are in college, only that they are "college age" KurtNYC Sep 2014 #21

I look forward to hearing about his daughters getting knocked up TlalocW Sep 2014 #2

Said it before I could packman Sep 2014 #25

It's not unusual for that to happen. B Calm Sep 2014 #42

Ah, because taking away birth control will ensure that his daughters louis-t Sep 2014 #3

So this family does not want their insurance plan to have access to birth control. What about all jwirr Sep 2014 #4

Why should men have to pay for policies that cover maternity benefits? Downwinder Sep 2014 #6

Exactly. We could all find some reason we want out insurance company to do it our way. That jwirr Sep 2014 #7

I had a home owners policy for years and never collected for the Downwinder Sep 2014 #9

I've never met a man who wasn't born. Scuba Sep 2014 #8

Strangely, birth is also the leading cause of death. Glassunion Sep 2014 #12

It's true! Life is a 100% fatal sexually transmited disease. n/t eggplant Sep 2014 #35

100% mortality rate. riqster Sep 2014 #36

How many were financially liable for their birthing costs? Downwinder Sep 2014 #13

Single-payer, whispered a voice on the breeze. Orsino Sep 2014 #5

Yes, said a returning echo. jwirr Sep 2014 #10

single payer echo echo echo librechik Sep 2014 #11

If you don't like birth control BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #14

But if you like judging others and controlling them... Orsino Sep 2014 #18

And these idiots are different from the Taliban how, exactly? Initech Sep 2014 #15

Fundies aren't happy unless they've got their noses in other people's business. xfundy Sep 2014 #16

You know, maybe if they were putting their nose near other people's "business"... politicat Sep 2014 #24

I see... riqster Sep 2014 #37

HE doesn't have standing. MohRokTah Sep 2014 #17

Just because something is available doesn't mean you have to partake. Vinca Sep 2014 #19

Fuck Them. They are on TAXPAYER FUNDED HEALTHCARE ... Volaris Sep 2014 #20

And I Can't Support Policies.... Laxman Sep 2014 #22

Two things come to mind. A Simple Game Sep 2014 #23

More like "Strange Father of the Case" underpants Sep 2014 #26

In light of the Hobby Lobby decision I don't see how the court can deny the parents, cheapdate Sep 2014 #27

Doesn't matter either way Bartlet Sep 2014 #32

Until the conservative makeup of the SCOTUS cheapdate Sep 2014 #33

It says that two of them are adults. gollygee Sep 2014 #39

I don't either. I thought you had to show direct harm to be a party to a lawsuit. cheapdate Sep 2014 #40

Why doesn't he tell the other truth Cartoonist Sep 2014 #28

Fuck 'email matt819 Sep 2014 #29

love the poster LOL nt steve2470 Sep 2014 #30

�stocked unlocked liquor cabinet.� Bartlet Sep 2014 #31

Time for single payer! Quantess Sep 2014 #34

The ACA is really bringing them out of the woodwork isn't it? drm604 Sep 2014 #38

Typical. FlaGranny Sep 2014 #41

What a wonderful father - assuming his daughters will become whores while away at school. baldguy Sep 2014 #43

What's so strange????? This is the logical follow on to the Hobby decision and CK_John Sep 2014 #44