Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Spanking? America's killed a million Iraqi kids over the last 24 years. [View all]
Newsflash that's missing from the News.

Maybe more. No one knows as no one in authority with any power for knowing has kept track.
Back when Madeleine Albright was Secretary of State, we'd already killed 500,000 because of economic sanctions, which included embargoes of medicine and infant formula.
Madame Sec. of State Albright said it was "worth it."
'We Think the Price Is Worth It'
Media uncurious about Iraq policy's effects--there or here
By Rahul Mahajan
Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.
--60 Minutes (5/12/96)
Then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's quote, calmly asserting that U.S. policy objectives were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children, has been much quoted in the Arabic press. It's also been cited in the United States in alternative commentary on the September 11 attacks (e.g., Alexander Cockburn, New York Press, 9/26/01).
But a Dow Jones search of mainstream news sources since September 11 turns up only one reference to the quote--in an op-ed in the Orange Country Register (9/16/01). This omission is striking, given the major role that Iraq sanctions play in the ideology of archenemy Osama bin Laden; his recruitment video features pictures of Iraqi babies wasting away from malnutrition and lack of medicine (New York Daily News, 9/28/01). The inference that Albright and the terrorists may have shared a common rationale--a belief that the deaths of thousands of innocents are a price worth paying to achieve one's political ends--does not seem to be one that can be made in U.S. mass media.
It's worth noting that on 60 Minutes, Albright made no attempt to deny the figure given by Stahl--a rough rendering of the preliminary estimate in a 1995 U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report that 567,000 Iraqi children under the age of five had died as a result of the sanctions. In general, the response from government officials about the sanctions toll has been rather different: a barrage of equivocations, denigration of U.N. sources and implications that questioners have some ideological axe to grind (Extra!, 3-4/00).
There has also been an attempt to seize on the lowest possible numbers. In early 1998, Columbia University's Richard Garfield published a dramatically lower estimate of 106,000 to 227,000 children under five dead due to sanctions, which was reported in many papers (e.g. New Orleans Times-Picayune, 2/15/98). Later, UNICEF came out with the first authoritative report (8/99), based on a survey of 24,000 households, suggesting that the total excess deaths of children under 5 was about 500,000.
CONTINUED...
http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/we-think-the-price-is-worth-it/
I don't think the price was worth it.
Not diminishing DV in any way, but America's government has got a violence problem. We've tried voting it out, but it's still making war in Iraq.
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Spanking? America's killed a million Iraqi kids over the last 24 years. [View all]
Octafish
Sep 2014
OP
Agreed, I am not sure either problem has been totally overlooked. Just because there is lots of kid
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#82
Because there was no military/strategic advantage of occupation given the history of
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#84
You don't have to agree, history has more than proven my assertions correct.
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#109
What Adrian Peterson did was horrific, but this is a million times more horriffic.
Initech
Sep 2014
#13
I actually can get behind air strikes in Iraq, but intervening in Syria is ridiculous
Hippo_Tron
Sep 2014
#40
Not trying to divert attention from spanking, but to the killing of a million innocent people.
Octafish
Sep 2014
#65
I was surprised at both the focus and its size. Please see #65 above and this from the same below...
Octafish
Sep 2014
#66
Iraqi people had nothing to do with 9-11. They didn't even vote for CIA-installed Saddam Hussein.
Octafish
Sep 2014
#70
Dead kids have a power to open eyes. Yet some spend years trying to shut your mouth.
johnnyreb
Sep 2014
#72
what we do to our kids matter. what we do to other people's children also matter.
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2014
#75
In 1990, Iraq was given a green light to attack Kuwait by Baker per April Glaspie.
Octafish
Sep 2014
#92
Saying we have no opinion in a dispute over slant drilling is NOT a green light for war.
EX500rider
Sep 2014
#94
Father Bush lied his miserable way into an Iraq war just like his dim son did.
LawDeeDah
Sep 2014
#122
It was a green light to Saddam, remember that Rumsfeld and the PNACers were buds with Saddam
LawDeeDah
Sep 2014
#127