Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,371 posts)

2. But the headlines the next day were all variations on

Tue Sep 16, 2014, 10:09 PM

Sep 2014

"Obama and Clinton Head to New Hampshire!"

The narrative had been agreed to and mere facts could not be allowed to interfere with it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama: 38%, Edwards: 30%, Clinton: 29%... (Iowa 2008) [View all] ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 OP

Was this a primary result in 2008? Or a poll? Cali_Democrat Sep 2014 #1

Primary result. Jon Stewart just made the point on TDS. nt ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #6

But the headlines the next day were all variations on QC Sep 2014 #2

Edwards would have lost to McCain because his infidelity. JoePhilly Sep 2014 #4

2 of those 3 won't be running in 2016. JoePhilly Sep 2014 #3

2 of those 3 weren't running when Hillary was a given. nt ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #5

Think Hillary will forget 2008? JoePhilly Sep 2014 #7

I was saying it back in 2011. JoePhilly Sep 2014 #13

2008 Iowa? Renew Deal Sep 2014 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #9

Yes. nt ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #10

So? It is a caucus state, not standard primary still_one Sep 2014 #11

You better believe it! zappaman Sep 2014 #15