Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To the Anti-Sanders folk: Who do you like? [View all]justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)35. I like Kirsten Gillibrand myself
and she seems to be making moves to indicate that she may be interested in higher office.
Here's some info from Wiki:
Gillibrand's views on many issues can be defined as an evolution based on constituent needs; some have characterized this progression as flip-flopping. In the House, she was known as a conservative liberal[1] or centrist,[74] serving at the will of a highly conservative electorate.[1] She was a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, a caucus of fiscally conservative Democrats.[75] In the Senate, she is known more as a populist-leaning liberal, as she represents a heavily Democratic state. At the time of her appointment to the Senate, a Salon.com editorial said that Gillibrand's reputation in the House characterized her as "a hybrid politician who has remained conservative enough to keep her seat while appearing progressive enough to raise money downstate."[1]
On social issues, Gillibrand is generally liberal, supporting a pro-choice agenda,[76] legalization of same-sex marriage,[77] and health care reform with a public option.[78] She is a strong advocate for government transparency, being one of a few members of Congress that releases as much personal and scheduling information.[79] She is also a strong supporter of female equality and involvement, having begun the website offthesidelines.org in 2011. Although a supporter of gun rights while in the House, Gillibrand has since moved in the direction of gun control.[80] On economic issues, Gillibrand has been more fiscally conservative.[citation needed]
Gillibrand has received an 8% rating from the American Conservative Union,[81] 70% from Americans for Democratic Action,[82] and 90% from the American Civil Liberties Union.[83] OnTheIssues.org rates Gillibrand as a "populist-leaning liberal."[84]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand
On social issues, Gillibrand is generally liberal, supporting a pro-choice agenda,[76] legalization of same-sex marriage,[77] and health care reform with a public option.[78] She is a strong advocate for government transparency, being one of a few members of Congress that releases as much personal and scheduling information.[79] She is also a strong supporter of female equality and involvement, having begun the website offthesidelines.org in 2011. Although a supporter of gun rights while in the House, Gillibrand has since moved in the direction of gun control.[80] On economic issues, Gillibrand has been more fiscally conservative.[citation needed]
Gillibrand has received an 8% rating from the American Conservative Union,[81] 70% from Americans for Democratic Action,[82] and 90% from the American Civil Liberties Union.[83] OnTheIssues.org rates Gillibrand as a "populist-leaning liberal."[84]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand
And here she is on the issues:
http://www.ontheissues.org/NY/Kirsten_Gillibrand.htm
She's proven in NY that she can win over conservatives and liberals alike. I like that she governs in a way that supports her constituency... it may drive many on DU mad that she does this but I approve, because that is actually the job of a representative--to represent their constituents (whether I like those constituents political views or not). You don't see that many politicians doing that these days.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't think such a switch would cost him any of his current support.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Sep 2014
#4
I think his progressive base would support him regardless of the letter after his name
thesquanderer
Sep 2014
#8
I'm decidedly in Hillary's corner but welcome a Sanders run and would vote for him in a general.
wyldwolf
Sep 2014
#11
One thing which will halt his ability to become president his title of Independent Socialists.
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#12
As I see it, if he should decide to run he will probably end up taking lots of heat as I stated on
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#14
I hear a lot about Hillary being too Wall Street friendly, yes she gives speeches to Wall Street
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#18
I agree... Can you give me a link so I can post this without a fuss? I don't think the media has
freshwest
Sep 2014
#32
Be glad to, I see her connection to Walmart and Goldmann Sachs posted with what appears to
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#39
WOW! I will be using that here for what it's worth. But will this get to women, in particular?
freshwest
Sep 2014
#40
I wouldn't go so far as to say I'm "anti-Hillary" but I do find many of her positions - especially
nomorenomore08
Sep 2014
#21
If he wants the D after his name to be able to run as a D, it's easy to do.
thesquanderer
Sep 2014
#24
Except that each of them - including Dukakis - actually *DID* convince enough people.
baldguy
Sep 2014
#34
I'm not anti-Sanders, I just do not believe he would be capable of winning the GE
MohRokTah
Sep 2014
#47