General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Facts Our Party Will Not Officially Admit, That It Must [View all]True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Wilson and FDR's powers were theoretically absolute in total war, but never came close to trying to exercise it as such, and they were careful to maintain most of the forms of democracy even where they were assured of getting their way by the public mood.
Reagan wasn't especially powerful, he just appointed a lot of criminals who ignored the law. (Most felony convictions of any administration's appointees to date)
Bush was the opposite of FDR, and was sort of a logical extension of Reagan. His legal powers were not that extensive even with the Patriot Act, but he completely ignored the law and did whatever he wanted that was within his regime's practical capability. But ironically you lose some level of power when you abandon the pretense of law, so it weakened itself a lot more than was necessary.