Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't know what Hillary actually believes in. [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)173. I'm aware of what can happen in Iowa, which is part of the problem with this
country's electoral system.
But why is she the most likely Democratic Nominee? Who decides these things? This is a big country with a whole lot of people who would represent the voters far more effectively than Hillary has done.
I don't get this inevitability thing. It sounds more like 'entitlement', that one person is the entitled 'successor', sort of the way monarchies work.
I don't care frankly if she is the nominee, I certainly hope not, I won't be supporting her because of her Corporate and Foreign Policy record which we do know about. This country comes first and it is the duty of the Dem Party to provide support for numerous candidates, not to annoint someone without any input from the voters or other viable candidates.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
196 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you are wanting a Republican in the WH in 2017, then run Bernie, the Republicans will be elected.
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#179
I think we need a president who is knowledgeabe on a wide variety of subjects.
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#195
And that describes one of the main problems with her. She is all about politics, not so much
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#145
It is too early and there is no denying she is the most likely Democratic nominee
karynnj
Sep 2014
#166
I'm aware of what can happen in Iowa, which is part of the problem with this
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#173
I think you just outlined the problem. It is a large group of extremely wealthy people
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#177
" It's a truly sucky position for her to be in" $155 million in speeches and book deals...
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#122
That's a good summary of the bind some of us feel in terms of voting for her if she does run
davidpdx
Sep 2014
#133
I don't disagree with that, but I think Hillary's pushing of fracking, for example
cali
Sep 2014
#12
There is no lack of another choice, as Liberals have pointed out for decades, starting when
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#184
The tech job examples at your links indicate situations where the H-1B rules are not being enforced.
SunSeeker
Sep 2014
#140
She is saying that trade agreements are not the problem when trade agreements lead
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#128
I'm saying the party apparatus, broadly, is the real center of policy decisions
Recursion
Sep 2014
#188
I don't remember if DNI is a full "pleasure of the President" position or not
Recursion
Sep 2014
#190
Personally I think the power of the NSA/CIA transcends the power of the President.
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#193
Really? So a moderate Repub would be alright, you were okay with eg, Reagan, Bush Sr?
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#147
yeah, what is all this fuss about what the President might do if elected anyway? Besides it's none
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2014
#149
by changing the parameters of political debate - If you start at center right and then "compromise"
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2014
#156
Sorry, you're wrong, she is running. She knows it, I know it, and I bet you know it too. n/t
A Simple Game
Sep 2014
#64
Or do we know what she believes in because we've seen this act so many times before?
raindaddy
Sep 2014
#21
I believe that would be both political parties and the corporate interests that own them.
CentralMass
Sep 2014
#41
Ask the people causing an economic inequality problem to solve it, that always works so well.
Ikonoklast
Sep 2014
#75
I do know what GOP and conservatives believe in and that motivates me to support
beachbum bob
Sep 2014
#33
If she announces and still refuses to be clear on her stances, then she's in trouble
DFW
Sep 2014
#42
" She isn't just a supporter of the TPP, but one of its principle architects."
Plucketeer
Sep 2014
#45
And that is exactly what is our problem with her. Speak up Hillary - we need to know what you
jwirr
Sep 2014
#47
+1. I've never seen that argument made when the thing described as "perfect"
winter is coming
Sep 2014
#63
"Nader did 2000, the lefties did 2010, and inaction is always to keep your powder dry"
MisterP
Sep 2014
#71
Sanders wouldn't be speaking about running for president if he "supports Hillary"...
cascadiance
Sep 2014
#84
Yep, name ONE thing that Hillary would do better for us than Warren or Sanders!
cascadiance
Sep 2014
#85
She'll support anything that hurts the middle class/non-rich, then adjusts at her convenience, after
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#114
Yeah, the SLS is a variation of the Ares V, to be sure. Which I think was sort of in line with the
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#138
Think General Bullmose from "Li'l Abner", complete with 'amen chorus':
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2014
#132
Many Wall Street investment bankers are pro-choice. No doubt, many are pro-marriage equality
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2014
#157
She is a liberal on most issues. However, many on DU have tunnel vision when it comes to Hillary,
still_one
Sep 2014
#182
Yes, I have been successful in searching for other potential candidates on the issues, these sites
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#178