Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Facts Our Party Will Not Officially Admit, That It Must [View all]stupidicus
(2,570 posts)117. Gee, what happened to the biggie
that the war criminals have to be prosecuted according to domestic/ international law? Dictators thrive and grow in an environement absent fear of reprisals, which is applicable to about if not everything you noted in some way, no?
ANd is BHO afraid of social disorder as Bush was?
A recent New York Times article by Matt Apuzzo reported that in the Obama era, police departments have received tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft. The result is that police agencies around the nation possess military-grade equipment, turning officers who are supposed to fight crime and protect communities into what looks like an invading army. And military-style police raids have increased in recent years, with one count putting the number at 80,000 such raids last year. http://billmoyers.com/2014/08/13/not-just-ferguson-11-eye-opening-facts-about-americas-militarized-police-forces/
He is to Bush as Bush was to Raygun
[During] this 50 years of evolution, they really changed from their initial intent," she told host Alyona Minkovski. They were designed to deal with very violent confrontations starting primarily in the 1980s when Ronald Reagan was ramping up the drug war and these federal grants [were] coming in to take military surplus goods and transfer them to local police forces. Those two things sort of coalesced. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/08/retro-report-police-militarization-_n_5785540.html
given he's made no moves to roll it all back. It's almost like it's "new" news or something.
ANd perhaps the dems, or Clinton in particular, should explain this.
That's where the 1033 program comes in. The 1033 program is a Department of Defense initiative that channels surplus military equipment to state and local police departments. It began in 1990 after initially being authorized by Congress through the National Defense Authorization Act. At first, it only transferred excess personal property from the Defense Department to federal and state agencies for drug-related activities. Later, in 1996, it was authorized for use in both drug- and terrorism-related situations.http://www.thewire.com/national/2014/08/the-evolution-of-police-militarization-in-ferguson-and-beyond/376107/
The simple fact of the matter, it'd the precursor -- the "War on Drugs" -- to the phony war on terror, that explains the militarization, and like with almost all matters of foreign policy, that's where we find the most "bi-partisanship" in DC.
Thanks for demanding that the dems admit their complicity in all these abominations.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
193 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the Dems just don't want to call them out. They think they'll get killed. Literally.
librechik
Sep 2014
#5
I agree, our leaders are physically afraid of the GOP's terrorist leanings.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#7
who got anthrax? Where's Paul Wellstone today? How is President Kennedy enjoying his retirement?
yurbud
Sep 2014
#101
Are you suggesting these points should be part of the Democratic Party Platform?
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#2
Well I agree that we need to make voter suppression a key issue in the upcoming election
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#18
The Democratic Party leadership are cowards and have been since November 22, 1963.
Scuba
Sep 2014
#31
I don't think it would be possible to miss the point any more than that.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#19
In case you are series, your post can be taken in more than one way. It appears to me that you
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#184
he wanted Gauntanemo closed and moved to the Thomas Correctional Center in Illnois.
m-lekktor
Sep 2014
#90
That's not a military facility. It has no institutional connection to Gitmo.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#92
It really seems to make you uncomfortable to have people disagree with you....
Oktober
Sep 2014
#151
"before they assume the powers they grant to themselves via money, corrupt courts, and guns"
Triana
Sep 2014
#21
Pretty much. Their internet cesspools are usually full of unmoderated threats of assassination.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#30
people still believe this wonderfully effective commercial branding from the gun industry?
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#105
You seriously believe they didn't exhaust every option before satisfying themselves
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#38
+1 It's corruption, not fear, that leaves the Democratic Party silent on these issues.
Scuba
Sep 2014
#35
Finding one who agrees with me on every single one of my 8 points would be challenging.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#148
seriously? you make the claim that finding any for EACH would be easy, and you don't
cali
Sep 2014
#159
trolling? YOU have a lot of nerve, dear. No, as I point out they're scarcer than hen's teeth.
cali
Sep 2014
#185
Probably, but Bush was heinous enough on his own to justify calling him a dictator.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#97
Then there was the glee he showed when they told him the price of gas at the pump.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2014
#99
The Carter administration trained and funded Savak, the Shah of Iran's secret police torturers.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#95
I have to disagree with #7. Every two years there are 435 separate elections for
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#53
yup, voters failed to understand the importance of 2010 election and the Dems failed to tell them
librechik
Sep 2014
#72
No, a majority of people in a majority of House districts voted for the Republican.
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#100
No your analogy doesn't work because by law each House district must have
totodeinhere
Sep 2014
#190
Not even close. Population per Rep. varies by as much as 59% from state to state.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#191
Non-violent protest works just fine under most circumstances if people are committed.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#79
A loan buyback program is pretty far removed from a mass street-protest.
True Blue Door
Sep 2014
#162
As much as I agree with most of what you say, Obama is not blameless in all of this.
Welibs
Sep 2014
#108
The continuous tantrum of the Republicans during the Clinton years resulting in his bogus impeachment
Denis 11
Sep 2014
#141
bwahahahaha. you live in an alternate "reality" and your knowledge of history is slim.
cali
Sep 2014
#187
The Government doesn't work for us. We work for them. We are thoroughly owned and operated.
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#128