Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)
24. This seems to be correct - location, location, location
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 08:52 PM
Apr 2012

I have a pretty limited knowledge-base on this issue.

I have questioned people who know a heck of a lot more about it than I do, and my understanding of what I heard back is that the opposition is to projects being built in the wrong places and without any of the necessary impact studies.

As in, the complaint is not about them being built, but about them being built in unnecessarily disruptive/deadly areas, and about the projects being raced through so certain property owners can make a killing - and that these things are jammed through because basic studies would reveal that the wind farms should be built in Location B, as opposed to Location A.

Animal and environmental causes do not always align, but I actually can't think of a single animal advocate I know who doesn't care about the environment. And I know a lot of animal advocates. The first animal law conference I ever attended was on the links and shared interests of the two movements.

Before people are quick to jump on the "denigrate animal advocates by any possible means" bandwagon here, think about the statement I'm making. I have literally never met an animal advocate who wasn't also deeply concerned about the environment. If they exist, I think they are a terrifically small minority of the overall movement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

read this from your own link nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #1
Nothing is completely harmless snooper2 Apr 2012 #2
read about the perils of dihydrous oxide ... zbdent Apr 2012 #6
Which may be rather harmful if LanternWaste Apr 2012 #13
or inhaled in large quantities ... zbdent Apr 2012 #15
bumper-stickers philosophies notwithstanding. LanternWaste Apr 2012 #16
What's the difference between the turbines on windfarms and the windmills that have been at work Ecumenist Apr 2012 #3
Concentration, we are having that issue in Jamul and Ocotillo right now nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #5
I know about San Onofre. I'm in the north State and have NEVER been happy with reactors in Ecumenist Apr 2012 #8
The other problem is construction, my editor has literally been chasing nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #10
Yeah, I agree with you. Here in the north, there is a "wind farm" @ the Altamont Pass. Ecumenist Apr 2012 #11
Same here, raptors are not having an easy time nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #12
What green technologies would you prefer? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #18
Distributive, as in solar in every roof, as first line nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #20
I agree about solar on every roof. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #21
I think the reason you don't read about it here is madokie Apr 2012 #7
I have no position in this argument, but I've seen a lot of wind turbines built and installed... JVS Apr 2012 #19
This seems to be correct - location, location, location jsmirman Apr 2012 #24
Birds can learn to avoid turbines. They can't learn to avoid acid rain. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #4
There are turbines all over Spain WolverineDG Apr 2012 #9
spent a weekend at the Green Mountain Energy Wind Farm in Brazos, TX last year LanternWaste Apr 2012 #14
Wind farms are proliferating in southern Minnesota. Driving on I-90 on the way to Sioux Falls, MineralMan Apr 2012 #17
Electricity is more important than their life jenwilson Apr 2012 #22
Show your study to the golden eagles that are being killed. former9thward Apr 2012 #23
Here are the species that were studied: XemaSab Apr 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Those anti-wind-power rum...»Reply #24