Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cha

(318,835 posts)
32. Well, there's this from a "senior analyst" at Flashpoint Global Partners..
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 12:46 AM
Sep 2014

(NY Times) Islamic State Issues Video Challenge to Obama September 17, 2014

Laith Alkhouri, a senior analyst at Flashpoint Global Partners, a New York security consulting firm that tracks militant websites, said the Islamic State “appears to be more relentless than ever, not only expanding in territory but also raising the bar in its confrontation with the world’s top superpower.”

“In some ways, it’s attempting to prove to jihadists that while Al Qaeda is missing in action, we are rising to the occasion,” Mr. Alkhouri said. “It demonstrates the true intention of the group, to operate on an international level.”

http://flashpoint-intel.com/

And, this says differently than Flashpoint on whether Snowden's "leaks" did harm with the terrorist orgs..

More Snowden leaks - and this time Al Qaeda is the surveillance target (+video)

".. But what caught my eye in one of the unredacted slides was the mention of Al Qaeda in Iraq being a particular target of the NSA's efforts. The slide reads: "Visual Communicator – Free application that combines Instant Messaging, Photo-Messaging, and Push2Talk capabilities on a mobile platform. VC used on GPRS or 3G networks." The next five words were what the Times tried and failed to redact: "heavily used in AQI Mosul Network."

The aim as described in the documents is to target mobile phone apps that can give away a target's physical location. The utility of this in tracking terrorists hardly needs to be stated. The document describes a program focusing on clear security interests – Al Qaeda in Iraq, now calling itself Al Qaeda in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) – killed thousands in Iraq during the US-led war there and continues to carry out suicide bombings and attacks on civilians there on a weekly basis. ISIS is also deeply involved in the civil war in Syria, and the groups ties to Al Qaeda make it an obvious security concern for the US.."


snip//

"..But his claim that "none of this has anything to do with terrorism" is not reasonable. That's pure nonsense -- as is his attempt to suggest that any revelations of eavesdropping techniques can't do any harm because terrorists already know all about it. Terrorists may know that the US is trying to spy on them as best it can (just as Germany and France know that). But knowing the precise method is another thing altogether."

MOre..
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2014/0130/More-Snowden-leaks-and-this-time-Al-Qaeda-is-the-surveillance-target-video

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, they didn't. They helped Putin. randome Sep 2014 #1
That's not possible LondonReign2 Sep 2014 #2
It helped him politically, not in terms of hard data. randome Sep 2014 #5
How did it help him politically? Hissyspit Sep 2014 #18
You mean the NSA benefited Putin. Violating the Constitution is definitely not benefiting sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #20
yes this terrorism stuff is all a red herring Man from Pickens Sep 2014 #26
In the short term, but not in the long term. Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #27
They embarrassed Obama. That's all the critics really gave a shit about. /nt Marr Sep 2014 #3
They embarrassed Obama. That's all his fans really gave a shit about. /nt LondonReign2 Sep 2014 #6
No, critics were and are interested in government intrusion and privacy rights. /nt Marr Sep 2014 #7
Are the critics you refer to in post 3 different from the critics in post 7? LondonReign2 Sep 2014 #9
Yes, I meant to refer to the group that you described as "fans". Marr Sep 2014 #14
Myth busted LittleBlue Sep 2014 #4
More myths that need busting lark Sep 2014 #11
+1 LittleBlue Sep 2014 #13
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #8
No. But, the CIA did help the terrorists. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #10
kick for the MIC whiners librechik Sep 2014 #12
Still, no excuse! He criticized the government and that is just plain wrong! Douglas Carpenter Sep 2014 #15
One report says it did, one report says it didn't nt kelliekat44 Sep 2014 #16
and anyone with a brain can figure out.... GummyBearz Sep 2014 #24
every time Clapper opens his mouth, a MisterP Sep 2014 #17
It ESPECIALLY didn't help the Official US Authorized Terrorists Demeter Sep 2014 #19
This report is laughable, as if the released information context can only be the internet. uponit7771 Sep 2014 #21
What the hell did he lie about? LiberalLovinLug Sep 2014 #36
Another link for you marym625 Sep 2014 #22
Who are "Flashpoint Global Partners", and who paid them to prepare that "report"? George II Sep 2014 #23
Well, there's this from a "senior analyst" at Flashpoint Global Partners.. Cha Sep 2014 #32
I guess my question hit a little too close to home??? George II Sep 2014 #25
Let me google that for you Electric Monk Sep 2014 #28
Cute - I already did google them and found their website.... George II Sep 2014 #33
Snowden's leaks? No. Recursion Sep 2014 #29
And there is the thread win. nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #34
But what about that big war between Australia and Indonesia??!?!?!? bullwinkle428 Sep 2014 #30
Kicked for an early morning review of Law of the Land ... MrMickeysMom Sep 2014 #31
Then Comrade Eddie should have no problem at the bar of the court. When is his flight back? nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #35
"Comrade" Eddie? sure, and Putin is Karl Marx LiberalLovinLug Sep 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Snowden's leaks d...»Reply #32