Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did you take Al Qaeda / bin Laden seriously before 9/11? [View all]jakeXT
(10,575 posts)17. PBS did
But there's some confusion here apparently. Today in the United States, we hear from law enforcement about Al Qaeda.
Yes.
But to you that's something different.
Well, I [really] laugh when I hear the FBI talking about Al Qaeda as an organization of bin Laden. ... [It's really a] very simple story. If bin Laden is to receive Arabs from Saudi Arabia and from Kuwait--from other regions--he is [to] receive them in the guest house in Peshawar. They used to go to the battle field and come back, without documentation.
What do you mean without documentation?
There [was] no documentation of who has arrived. Who has left. How long he stayed. There's only [a nice general reception]. And you go there. And you join in the battle field. ... Very simple organization. Now, he was embarrassed by many families when they called him and ask what happened to our son. He don't know. `Cause there's no record. There's no documentation. Now he asked some of his colleagues to start documenting the movement of every Arab coming under his umbrella. ... It is recorded that [they] arrived in this date and stayed in this house. ... And then there was a record of thousands and thousands of people. Many of them had come only for two weeks, three weeks and then disappeared. That record, that documentation was called the record of Al Qaeda. So that was Al Qaeda. There's nothing sinister about Al Qaeda. It's not like an organization--like any other terrorist organization or any other underground group. I don't think he used any name for his underground group. If you want to name it, you can name it "bin Laden group." But if they are using the term Al Qaeda ... Al Qaeda is just a record for the people who came to Peshawar and moved from there back and forth to the guest house. And moved back to their country. And if they want to follow the number, they must be talking about 20, 30 thousand people. Which is impossible to trace. And I think most of those records are in the hands of the Saudi government anyway, because people used the Saudi airlines, [at] a very much reduced fare. Twenty-five percent of the total fare of a trip to Islamabad. ...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/interviews/al-fagih.html
published april 1999; last updated sept. 2001
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/
Yes.
But to you that's something different.
Well, I [really] laugh when I hear the FBI talking about Al Qaeda as an organization of bin Laden. ... [It's really a] very simple story. If bin Laden is to receive Arabs from Saudi Arabia and from Kuwait--from other regions--he is [to] receive them in the guest house in Peshawar. They used to go to the battle field and come back, without documentation.
What do you mean without documentation?
There [was] no documentation of who has arrived. Who has left. How long he stayed. There's only [a nice general reception]. And you go there. And you join in the battle field. ... Very simple organization. Now, he was embarrassed by many families when they called him and ask what happened to our son. He don't know. `Cause there's no record. There's no documentation. Now he asked some of his colleagues to start documenting the movement of every Arab coming under his umbrella. ... It is recorded that [they] arrived in this date and stayed in this house. ... And then there was a record of thousands and thousands of people. Many of them had come only for two weeks, three weeks and then disappeared. That record, that documentation was called the record of Al Qaeda. So that was Al Qaeda. There's nothing sinister about Al Qaeda. It's not like an organization--like any other terrorist organization or any other underground group. I don't think he used any name for his underground group. If you want to name it, you can name it "bin Laden group." But if they are using the term Al Qaeda ... Al Qaeda is just a record for the people who came to Peshawar and moved from there back and forth to the guest house. And moved back to their country. And if they want to follow the number, they must be talking about 20, 30 thousand people. Which is impossible to trace. And I think most of those records are in the hands of the Saudi government anyway, because people used the Saudi airlines, [at] a very much reduced fare. Twenty-five percent of the total fare of a trip to Islamabad. ...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/interviews/al-fagih.html
published april 1999; last updated sept. 2001
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Interesting choice of username. You're aware that Al Quaeda translates as "The Foundation"?
Electric Monk
Sep 2014
#31
Yup....I was in high school at the time and even I remember those bombings
Cali_Democrat
Sep 2014
#21
I remember the bombings but don't remember hearing Al Quaeda or Osama Bin Laden mentioned
Louisiana1976
Sep 2014
#29
Those who have the ability to look into the archives at this site could check back and see
BKH70041
Sep 2014
#45
No i didn't take them seriously but after they attacked NYC I take them and the fact
hrmjustin
Sep 2014
#28
It's interesting that "did not wish to select any of the options provided." is currently winning. nt
Electric Monk
Sep 2014
#33
Oh yeah right after I saw the classified documents, the daily briefings and
SomethingFishy
Sep 2014
#38
I took them as a threat in the 90s beginning with the embassy bombings, and then the Cole
Uncle Joe
Sep 2014
#48
Yes, and I knew that Bush was ignoring the threat. Posting on a right wing dominated
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#62
Some of us read the "Terror 2000" report and just knew Bush was gonna fuck it up. nt
msanthrope
Sep 2014
#70
JFK was going to end the CIA, Why? Harry Truman regretted the NSA, Why?
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2014
#77