Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Emma Watson threat looks like it was a marketing hoax [View all]
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/976588-emma-watson-nudes-nope-naked-pictures-threat-from-4chan-after-speech-is-a-hoax/The purported Emma Watson nude photos dont seem to exist and the threat to release them appears to be based on a hoax.
The purported threat came as dozens of women have fallen victim to the massive celebrity hacking scheme in the last few weeks, with hundreds of images circulating online.
Watson was reported to have been targeted by people who got mad at her speech, with a website called Emma Watson is Next appearing. Reports about the threat featured comments from 4chan and Reddit users claiming that they would target Watson, with the primary focus of the reports being the website.
There is evidence that the emmayouarenext.com website is hosted by Rantic and that they have a recent history of inventing stories of this nature, they even reused the 4chan + hacker angle from a previous promotion, the user said.
It seems the whole point of marketing these days is to sell lies to as many people as possible and this particular campaign appears to have done that very successfully.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Were the replies to the hoax part of the hoax? Or did 4chan do those all on their own?
Cerridwen
Sep 2014
#1
It's called trolling for a reaction for a reason. You took the bait, so it worked.
DavidG_WI
Sep 2014
#79
Actually, 4chan was trolled and took the bait. I've been offline for 2 weeks-ish.
Cerridwen
Sep 2014
#82
Emma Watson got tormented by these "pranksters" because she was a high profile woman.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#22
whether the threat is real or not is not the issue and not what the discussion is about
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#10
Reminds me of the how the right changes things up when called out about fake Obama story/outrage
The Straight Story
Sep 2014
#13
The threat still existed even if it was a lie. The disgusting misogynist 4chan comments to the
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#37
Really Warren? Here is the thread in HoF. Not one who says 4chan should be shut down.
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#52
The fake PR firm doesn't give a flying fuck about 4chan being shut down. Advocating for such was
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#66
Then the marketing hoax people are harassing her. That doesn't make it okay. n/t
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#14
Exactly. And the misogynist responses to the original story were frightening.
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#15
serious women, doing serious work, in front of govt bodies. think sandra fluke. slut. take a video
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#41
Calling it a hoax can mislead people into thinking she wasn't actually victimized.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#34
I'm not saying they cared about the contents of the speech. Just that she had gotten a lot of
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#50
ya. here is a thread from DI. would you like to name the du men on that thread saying just that?
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#43
yes. and i know at least a handful are regular du men. this is what they think of women. nt
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#45
No, the "pranksters" weren't a marketing firm -- the firm was fake. But the pain to Watson was real.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#20
But the part that wasn't a hoax was that she was targeted because she was a woman
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#23
no. the probem some have in htis thread is the dismissal with hoax, you suckers. when the
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#42
The vile disgusting misogynists that were cheering on this "hoax" didn't know that...
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#51
he is not merely downplaying. he is purposely ignoring. it has been made clear
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#53
Perhaps not lecturing but attempting to lead the conversation away from a
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#63
The motives are clear, Warren. Profit at the expense of a feminist. Most feminists realized that
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#62
What's wrong with being naked? What a Puritanical society we live in. Maybe if we
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#65
that you support the meme of arent we all fools, as a woman is publicly threatened says a hell of a
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#85
i specifically addressed sabrina taking it to nudity. it was never about mere nudity as you both
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#89
Which of course DOESN'T mean that there are no sexist threats to women on the Internet
LeftishBrit
Sep 2014
#81