Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oh, my gosh, this is epic. Local reporter drops F-bomb, quits on live TV. Seriously - Epic. [View all]Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)137. Here is a very good explanation of our laws from a Washington Post blog
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/09/24/alaska-legalized-weed-39-years-ago-wait-what/?tid=sm_fb
So in reality this initiative would have little effect other than providing legal outlets for people to purchase their weed and providing some additional revenue for the state. Interesting to note, "In short, Alaskans use marijuana twice as much as Americans elsewhere, but so far the sky hasn't fallen." (Palins, notwithstanding.)
Alaska legalized weed 39 years ago
Yes, you read that headline right. In 1975, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled in Ravin v. State that the right to possess, cultivate and consume small amounts of marijuana in the home was protected under the state Constitution's right to privacy.
As you might imagine, that ruling has faced some opposition over the years, and has been placed into legal limbo from time to time due to various ballot and legislative challenges. But Alaska courts have repeatedly and consistently upheld the notion that Constitutional privacy protections cover the personal possession, cultivation and use of marijuana in Alaska.
"Alaskans can currently lawfully possess up to four ounces of marijuana in their homes for personal use [and cultivate up to 25 plants], but still risk prosecution under existing state and federal statutes," concludes University of Alaska law professor Jason Brandeis in an exhaustive history of Alaska marijuana law (which makes for a pretty interesting read if you're into such things). You could still technically be charged with marijuana possession if caught with less than four ounces in your home, but a court would essentially have to throw the charge out.
This puts Alaska in a unique position: in some respects its marijuana laws are more liberal than those in the Netherlands, which outlaw personal cultivation completely. While all eyes are on Colorado and Washington to see how those experiments with legal marijuana turn out, Alaska, with 39 years of (admittedly complicated) legalization history is largely overlooked: you'd think that forces on both sides of the national marijuana debate would be looking to Alaska for answers and arguments. Why aren't they?
<snip>
So in reality this initiative would have little effect other than providing legal outlets for people to purchase their weed and providing some additional revenue for the state. Interesting to note, "In short, Alaskans use marijuana twice as much as Americans elsewhere, but so far the sky hasn't fallen." (Palins, notwithstanding.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh, my gosh, this is epic. Local reporter drops F-bomb, quits on live TV. Seriously - Epic. [View all]
Blue_In_AK
Sep 2014
OP
I live in Alaska, I watch that news station and I want to tell you, I am offended
roguevalley
Sep 2014
#74
That's a terrible reason to not vote for the legalization initiative.
Dont call me Shirley
Sep 2014
#80
The anti people haven't been playing us for decades? How many billions? How many lives destroyed?
TheKentuckian
Sep 2014
#145
Actually, sounds like you are being manipulated, just in the opposite direction.
moriah
Sep 2014
#136
to you but not to me and a lot of people up here. If this had been a right winger
roguevalley
Sep 2014
#114
no. you can have medical marijuana. decriminalization has been underway since forever
roguevalley
Sep 2014
#116
God, I love her. Shake the system until the stoic right-wingers fall on their ass.
BlueJazz
Sep 2014
#14
actually, lots of right wingers are for it. She was wrong and probably lost
roguevalley
Sep 2014
#76
Aw..I understand what you mean. I've (since) read the whole story and researched some facts...
BlueJazz
Sep 2014
#124
hugs, blue jazz. :F I for one will be glad 11-3. Everytime I turn on Netflix, our conservative
roguevalley
Sep 2014
#133
Reminds me --- it was in the mid '70's when a reporter for a UHF station in Florida said,
Hoppy
Sep 2014
#15
I prefer the 'F bomb' to lies. Too bad there isn't a way to pin a growing nose on
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#29
The MSM not 'touching' her is to HER credit. Now I really like her. The MSM is the least trusted,
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#89
I question her journalistic integrity and that should be a red flag to anyone looking to hire her
sweetloukillbot
Sep 2014
#109
What do you call using your position to promote your business w/o disclosing it?
joeglow3
Sep 2014
#140
I agree...lies, propaganda for the 1% hijacking the life right out from under us....
BlancheSplanchnik
Sep 2014
#75
actually, looking onself in the mirror .... I might agree if she didn't have a
roguevalley
Sep 2014
#77
I cannot for the life of me understand why weed makes people act like such assholes. nt
Dreamer Tatum
Sep 2014
#31
If she's been reporting on the MM movement, she and her station should have disclosed
Heidi
Sep 2014
#34
We're free to quit jobs anyway we want to. It's our last bastion of free will....
RagAss
Sep 2014
#128
tv news has been giving us a big fuck you for years, refreshing to see someone give one back
whereisjustice
Sep 2014
#97
But did she tell the truth? If not, then yes, that would be classless. I would give anything
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#108