Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some of the Russian soldiers killed while on vacation [View all]That's why these states (Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia) demand permanently stationed NATO troops on their territories - to shorten that response time. Some NATO members are opposed. But apparently, a rapid deployment force is now able to react more quickly than before, able at least to show a presence within a shorter time. Of course, that would be a significant deterrent factor and would contribute to these countries' safety.
Stationing NATO troops and the creation of a NATO rapid deployment force would "contribute to these countries' safety". Contribute to their safety from whom?
When push comes to shove, moving supplies is time-consuming. Personnel can be moved relatively quickly. That is supposed to allow the NATO Response Force to react more quickly. Another advantage is that multi-national troops would appear on the scene, which means NATO as a whole would be involved. Of course, you always have to remember that more troops would have to be transferred to these countries. But Russia also needs a certain amount of time to be ready for attack. That can definitely be compensated if you have an efficient early warning system.
Sounds like he is considering the possibility of a future Russian attack and defending the idea of a rapid deployment force to counter this possibility.
In Ukraine, Russia has maneuvered itself into a position that is basically a dead-end. But so has the West, because in the end, sanctions lead nowhere. Actually, this could be the last opportunity to find a common solution, but to do so, they would have to get together for talks.
I would love to see talks between Russia and the West.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Putin's sneaky war.. "Their bodies have been returned in recent weeks to loved ones who in many
Cha
Sep 2014
#2
The fact that there are some people who refuse to acknowledge what Russia is doing in Ukraine
mythology
Sep 2014
#7
I had failed to account for context in the earlier post and apologise unreservedly.
dipsydoodle
Sep 2014
#8
"Nobody, even Russian officials, has ever denied that a number of Russian volunteers is fighting and
pampango
Sep 2014
#15
Which is what Amnesty International did. And we are not 'forced' to agree with a former general's
pampango
Sep 2014
#18
feel free to cite another former NATO General of his rank, experience and expertise
reorg
Sep 2014
#20
Again, you are free to believe the opinion of a former general over that of Amnesty International.
pampango
Sep 2014
#22
Once again, we Jews are touched by this sudden concern about antisemitism in eastern europe.
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#38
No. As long as they are fighting Russians and traitors in a time of desperate need. I would say let
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#43
It would appear that your appreciation of "Russians" is similar to, uh, never mind n/t
reorg
Sep 2014
#44
Red herring aside, it was the pro-Russian seperatists who chose to seize government buildings.....
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#41