General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 4chan not at fault for Emma threats [View all]Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)and my only comment was about how 4chan is more than just the users of the /b/ subforum. Even scanning through the comments in that forum, what I saw was puzzlement and many people saying they were fine with what Watson said, or didn't care, and only a few rage-troll comments hating on Watson. No boasting from anyone about actually having nude photos of her. There was something 'off' about the whole thing from the start. So the charges of 'terrorism' because '4chan was threatening to release nude photos of Watson' to 'prevent her from speaking out', were aimed at the wrong people, since the people actually making the terroristic threats were anti-4chan 'celebrity publicists'.
Will those people be called 'terrorists' now? Somehow I sincerely doubt it.