Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre is not merely legal, it's praiseworthy. [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)3. Of course, but I disagree with your interpretation
that metaphor is clearly meant as falsely yelling fire... In fact, the original wording included the word falsely. In other words, speech that clearly imminently physically endangers people is not protected.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre is not merely legal, it's praiseworthy. [View all]
Donald Ian Rankin
Sep 2014
OP
The actual holding of the case was, in my opinion, a wretched one, but it's good to get
merrily
Sep 2014
#12
Holmes position has been superseded by Supreme Court rulings made 40 some years ago
Kaleva
Sep 2014
#13
Yeah, still, he never tried to say a true cry of "fire!" would be a violation of free speech.
moriah
Sep 2014
#16
His position on falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater has not been overruled, though.
merrily
Sep 2014
#17
Isn't the clear and common usage of that phrase directly implying the person doing the yelling knows
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#25
What if they don't believe the guy yelling fire until it's no longer a matter of belief?
freshwest
Sep 2014
#43