Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Not prosecuting any of the Wall Street criminals was a big failure. [View all]IDemo
(16,926 posts)39. Business Insider - The Real Story Of How 'Untouchable' Wall Street Execs Avoided Prosecution
I strongly encourage all to read the full article at the link. Despite what some are mistakenly suggesting, crimes were committed and there was every reason to prosecute. Except, as Dick Durbin is quoted: "The banks frankly own the place" (DC).
<>
As I documented at length in my 2011 book on America's two-tiered justice system, "With Liberty and Justice for Some," the evidence that felonies were committed by Wall Street is overwhelming. That evidence directly negates the primary excuse by Breuer (previously offered by Obama himself) that the bad acts of Wall Street were not criminal.
Numerous documents prove that executives at leading banks, credit agencies, and mortgage brokers were falsely touting assets as sound that they knew were junk the very definition of fraud.
As former Wall Street analyst Yves Smith wrote in her book "ECONned": "What went on at Lehman and AIG, as well as the chicanery in the CDO [collateralized debt obligation] business, by any sensible standard is criminal." Even lifelong Wall Street defender Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve Chair, said in Congressional testimony that "a lot of that stuff was just plain fraud."
A New York Times editorial in August explained that the DOJ's excuse for failing to prosecute Wall Street executives that it was too hard to obtain convictions "has always defied common sense, and all the more so now that a fuller picture is emerging of the range of banks' reckless and lawless activities, including interest-rate rigging, money laundering, securities fraud and excessive speculation."
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/why-wall-street-execs-werent-prosecuted-2013-1#ixzz3EMxnYGg2
Numerous documents prove that executives at leading banks, credit agencies, and mortgage brokers were falsely touting assets as sound that they knew were junk the very definition of fraud.
As former Wall Street analyst Yves Smith wrote in her book "ECONned": "What went on at Lehman and AIG, as well as the chicanery in the CDO [collateralized debt obligation] business, by any sensible standard is criminal." Even lifelong Wall Street defender Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve Chair, said in Congressional testimony that "a lot of that stuff was just plain fraud."
A New York Times editorial in August explained that the DOJ's excuse for failing to prosecute Wall Street executives that it was too hard to obtain convictions "has always defied common sense, and all the more so now that a fuller picture is emerging of the range of banks' reckless and lawless activities, including interest-rate rigging, money laundering, securities fraud and excessive speculation."
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/why-wall-street-execs-werent-prosecuted-2013-1#ixzz3EMxnYGg2
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
and we will continue- long into the future- to pay a steep price for Holder's failure
cali
Sep 2014
#3
It would have been political suicide to continue to weaken laws if we were sending them to prison.
Fearless
Sep 2014
#17
I am stating the fact that the too big to fail banks are larger now than before the crash.
Fearless
Sep 2014
#43
7...I think it was 7 bank execs that did commit suicide....not the metaphorical political suicide
Sheepshank
Sep 2014
#60
take the profit out of it, sure, but shouldn't people who have so flagrantly committed
cali
Sep 2014
#23
I see your point. Only peons have to pay the price for committing crimes. Holder walks with the
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#47
That is why Wall St. criminals always looking at bank robbers as bunch of plebeian amaeturs.
TRoN33
Sep 2014
#9
Not having honest Wall Street bankers and brokers is the big FAIL. Give it a rest and be
kelliekat44
Sep 2014
#19
The Right still claims it was Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi that cause the collapse...
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2014
#25
Not just a failure...it caused a major weakening of the public's faith in the justice system
CanonRay
Sep 2014
#28
Not having a legal framwork to prosecute Wall Street traders was the bigger issue.
MohRokTah
Sep 2014
#34
According to some posters on this thread, laundering drug money was not illegal. Weird.
Scuba
Sep 2014
#36
If the financial elite do it it's okay. If one of the 99% do it, lock em up for corporate profits.
stillwaiting
Sep 2014
#53