Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, Democrat and environmental activist [View all]alarimer
(17,146 posts)39. She is a crank, like the Geyers and Wakefield.
Her publication record does not support here assertions:
From Science-Based Medicine:
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/crank-conferences-a-parody-of-science-based-medicine-that-can-suck-in-even-reputable-scientists-and-institutions/
Dr. Herbert is, it turns out, a big fan of the idea that autism has something to do with neuroinflammation. Unfortunately, none of her publications persuasively presents evidence for this hypothesis, and lately shes publishing in bottom-feeding alternative medicine journals articles with titles like Learning From the Autism Catastrophe: Key Leverage Points. Suffice it to say, Dr. Herbert is big on biomedical woo, so much so that anti-vaccine propagandist David Kirby likes to cite her and Age of Autism loves her. Unfortunately, for all her grandiose claims that neuroinflammation is a major cause of autism and that mold and other environmental influences trigger it, Dr. Herberts publication record does not support these assertions. Go ahead. Head over to PubMed and look at Dr. Herberts publication record. Ill wait. She has listed 15 publications about autism, of which:
six are review articles
two are in alt-med journals, and one of these is an interview
one is a paper with dozens of authors reporting the results of mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements. (Dr. Herbert is solidly right in the middle of the huge pack of authors.)
Of the remainder, Dr. Herbert only appears to be first author or senior author on four publications on autism containing original research, and these appear to be all imaging studies of the brains of autistic children. In other words, Dr. Herbert is making claims far beyond what her publication record in the peer-reviewed literature can, even under the most charitable interpretation possible, support. Nothing in her publication record appears to support her concept of autism being a systemic, rather than brain-based condition. Theres nothing there to support a link between autism and gut disorders; nothing to support a link between autism and immune dysfunction; and nothing to support a link between environmental influences and autism. Thats not to say that there arent environmental factors that influence the development of autism; its just that theres nothing in Dr. Herberts publication record to support such a hypothesis or to identify what, if anything, those environmental factors might be.
This is the keynote speaker. She is, however, faculty at Harvard University.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Glad to see you seem to know as much about vaccines as you do about radiation.
NuclearDem
Sep 2014
#53
RFK Jr is a great Democrat, the son of another great Democrat who would be so proud of
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#58
He's not against vaccines. That's a lie spun by people who can only think in black and white.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#18
Yeah, I've been "told" that by lots of fake experts. Martha Hebert, the professor in neurobiology
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#33
You've been listening to too many Big Pharma shills. JFK Jr is not against vaccines, no matter how
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#60
It's a shame when one goes out on a crazy limb (anti-vax) and has it taint all their other good work
NightWatcher
Sep 2014
#5
Apparently you can't point out his asshattery when it comes to being an anti-vaxxer
zappaman
Sep 2014
#6
Because many people, you included, don't know that he doesn't just have "great stuff to say"
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#13
pnwmom… I think you waste your time with some of the carrot stroker remarks you're getting...
MrMickeysMom
Sep 2014
#57
So too bad he's so against the "science" of the oh so valuable mountaintop removal efforts...
cascadiance
Sep 2014
#30
That's irrelevant to his position on vaccines, which is still wrong and dangerous.
Spider Jerusalem
Sep 2014
#32
His position is that mercury shouldn't be added to vaccines that pregnant women and children get.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#47
I can understand that there is a debate on this, and he may perhaps really have a weak argument...
cascadiance
Sep 2014
#49
Like you, I don't have a great deal of knowledge of this subject, though I might have to change that
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#61
I do because a mountain of scientific research since Wakefield's original fraud has said otherwise.
NuclearDem
Sep 2014
#38
Mercury is a neurotoxin, and it's added to flu vaccines that pregnant women and small children
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#46
You'd do better wasting your time teaching a pig to sing than to reason with her.
hobbit709
Sep 2014
#56