Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

lotta BS in this article. when non whites gentify a neighbor is that racist too? nt msongs Sep 2014 #1
That happens a lot less frequently KamaAina Sep 2014 #2
Not to mention that his claim that, "No one is safer in communities of color than white folks.", AverageJoe90 Sep 2014 #7
Developers in neighborhoods where gentrification is taking should build mixed-income developments Louisiana1976 Sep 2014 #3
Why? AnalystInParadise Sep 2014 #17
The alternative to some kind of gentrification geek tragedy Sep 2014 #4
I have seen both kinds in Long Beach, CA as well. Throd Sep 2014 #8
So no integrated neighborhood can be stable? KamaAina Sep 2014 #12
Gentrification is integration. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #14
Yes, but does the community remain integrated? KamaAina Sep 2014 #15
Fort Greene would point to yes. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #18
Or should there be some cross-pollination? KamaAina Sep 2014 #20
That crown heights no longer exists . geek tragedy Sep 2014 #21
Sounds like de Blasio needs to step in. KamaAina Sep 2014 #22
He can do some, but not enough. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #23
As I recall, he's committed to building 200,000 affordable units citywide. KamaAina Sep 2014 #24
Build or preserve. And it will have to mean geek tragedy Sep 2014 #25
At least he's trying to keep up. KamaAina Sep 2014 #26
Far Rockaway area up in the air after Sandy. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #28
I was living in the NYC area when that happened. amandabeech Sep 2014 #40
Congratulations to Detroit for avoiding the curse of "gentrification". Nye Bevan Sep 2014 #5
Yeah, unfortunately it almost seems like a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't." nomorenomore08 Sep 2014 #6
Actually, people who would be called "gentrifiers" elsewhere KamaAina Sep 2014 #13
That's kind of what I was thinking too. Thanks for spelling it out. n/t nomorenomore08 Sep 2014 #37
Figurative "violence" should not be confused with actual violence XemaSab Sep 2014 #9
And as a response to #10 XemaSab Sep 2014 #11
Standing applause AnalystInParadise Sep 2014 #16
The Author is Doing This to Justify Violence as a Response to Gentrification AndyTiedye Sep 2014 #41
Displacement from Housing is Violence daredtowork Sep 2014 #10
Tom Bates is plotting against low-income housing?! KamaAina Sep 2014 #19
Yes daredtowork Sep 2014 #29
Monthly housing workshop?! KamaAina Sep 2014 #32
It's pathetic :( daredtowork Sep 2014 #36
"It is also a form of negligence and abuse by the State." nomorenomore08 Sep 2014 #38
Here's a clue: cities change... brooklynite Sep 2014 #27
Yes, but it would be best SickOfTheOnePct Sep 2014 #31
This. So much this. nomorenomore08 Sep 2014 #39
When whites move away it is white flight. AngryAmish Sep 2014 #30
"When whites stay put it is segregation." KamaAina Sep 2014 #33
White people staying in all white areas maintain segregation. AngryAmish Sep 2014 #34
It is class warfare, plain and simple. rug Sep 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gentrification’s insidiou...»Reply #34