Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: could any president have gotten away with NOT bombing ISIS? [View all]Renew Deal
(85,216 posts)7. Eventually someone would have had to go after them
We could have waited for the victors and then fought with a new established nation.
I also wonder if Obama did it to control the situation. It would go differently if it was left to his successors.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think we agree for a change. In particular about the "clusterfuck with no good options part."
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#11
At the Pottery Barn, if you break some of their merchandise, you pay the price of the merchandise
amandabeech
Sep 2014
#37
From President Obama's actions in the past I do not think he is inclined to jump up and bomb and
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#30
Not a chance. After those beheading videos even some anti-war progressives were for going in
brush
Sep 2014
#31
I doubt it. The invasion of Iraq and the destabilization of Syria created a power vacuum that ISIS
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2014
#32
Well, ISIS certainly isn't interested in 'working out our differences', are they?
randome
Sep 2014
#35
He could have not bombed ISIS, but the establishment would have called him weak and feckless
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#36