Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: could any president have gotten away with NOT bombing ISIS? [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)22. I think there's a ton of evidence that a lot of folks are scared by ISIS
and I think support for the bombing is the strongest evidence of that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think we agree for a change. In particular about the "clusterfuck with no good options part."
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#11
At the Pottery Barn, if you break some of their merchandise, you pay the price of the merchandise
amandabeech
Sep 2014
#37
From President Obama's actions in the past I do not think he is inclined to jump up and bomb and
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#30
Not a chance. After those beheading videos even some anti-war progressives were for going in
brush
Sep 2014
#31
I doubt it. The invasion of Iraq and the destabilization of Syria created a power vacuum that ISIS
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2014
#32
Well, ISIS certainly isn't interested in 'working out our differences', are they?
randome
Sep 2014
#35
He could have not bombed ISIS, but the establishment would have called him weak and feckless
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#36