Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you see THAT list of what Schlafly was trying to stop? laserhaas Sep 2014 #1
Schafly did a lot, but, alone, she would have become a laughingstock. merrily Sep 2014 #2
Yes. It had a 10 year expiration date (in the video). laserhaas Sep 2014 #3
"It should be a 2016 agenda to ratify and/or anew!" merrily Sep 2014 #10
Schlafly was a sell out. She is an attorney and worker in many other issues; but laserhaas Sep 2014 #5
No argument here, but she did not defeat the ERA by her lonesome. merrily Sep 2014 #11
That list of talking points is not what she was trying to accomplish. Orsino Sep 2014 #4
I don't disagree. Be that as it may - the "list" makes her look pretty figgn stupid (now). laserhaas Sep 2014 #6
Conservatives don't care to make stupid reasons AZ Progressive Sep 2014 #13
Yeah, those bugbears she used to frighten the rubes... Orsino Sep 2014 #19
I would say more Republican and religious right strength is what she was fighting for. merrily Sep 2014 #12
And in the longest view, aristocracy was her goal. Orsino Sep 2014 #20
As in "here come the aristocrats?" merrily Sep 2014 #23
Schlafly is still alive and her son founded a conservative website on Wiki. laserhaas Sep 2014 #24
Yes, I know, thanks. merrily Sep 2014 #27
I corrected the title; once you all discussed the overlook laserhaas Sep 2014 #28
No poster is always perfect. merrily Sep 2014 #29
The ERA was ratified by Congress in 1972. tritsofme Sep 2014 #7
HUH!?!? - Contradiction in statements laserhaas Sep 2014 #8
Semantics. tritsofme Sep 2014 #14
It was passed by Congress. merrily Sep 2014 #15
Yes, I misused the term. tritsofme Sep 2014 #16
So did the OP, but I think there is enough blame to go around. merrily Sep 2014 #17
Congress definitely deserves blame for never passing it again. tritsofme Sep 2014 #21
Maybe, but Congress hadn't given every amendment an expiration date. merrily Sep 2014 #22
That's a profound statement "we are not a sane nation--" laserhaas Sep 2014 #25
I didn't realize it would make an impression. merrily Sep 2014 #26
Schafly fucked over women for decades to come AZ Progressive Sep 2014 #9
The "radical" Sixties--that fought nonviolently for equal rights for African Americans merrily Sep 2014 #18
The uprise against Vietnam War; was solely due to the fact of the draft. laserhaas Sep 2014 #30
Solely? Is that why Muhammed Ali chose jail after he got drafted? merrily Sep 2014 #31
You are speaking of one person (who actually was convicted for refusing the draft). laserhaas Sep 2014 #34
Ali was one person, but thousands protested that war because it was merrily Sep 2014 #36
Actually, Schlafly was positioned to lose her battle, until the Houston Conferences. TheBlackAdder Sep 2014 #32
I'm going to research the actual(s) more. (Which states rescinded - which ones were never on board). laserhaas Sep 2014 #35
Hard to know who was worse... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2014 #33
Why choose only one? Twofers are free. So are multiples. merrily Sep 2014 #37
I attended that Rally unapatriciated Sep 2014 #38
Thanks Much - for your posting and link laserhaas Sep 2014 #40
I don't need to LibertyLover Sep 2014 #39
It was the era as well. Savannahmann Sep 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Equals Rights Amendment N...»Reply #25