Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
10. LA doesn't nearly have the same amount of smog as it used to.
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 06:01 PM
Sep 2014

Thanks to regulations.

They actually work!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The above explains why California has long been in the forefront merrily Sep 2014 #1
Still sad that the majority of places are in blue areas in blue states yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #2
It's population density driving both. surrealAmerican Sep 2014 #3
I don't think it's population density. Calista241 Sep 2014 #32
you're right reddread Sep 2014 #35
LA doesn't nearly have the same amount of smog as it used to. Cali_Democrat Sep 2014 #10
Agreed... Adsos Letter Sep 2014 #31
Yep. And they sure don't hurt, either. merrily Sep 2014 #33
I must admit, since 1987 Galileo126 Sep 2014 #4
It may be hard to comprehend, but LA basin in the sixties was worse - a LOT worse! Brother Buzz Sep 2014 #11
Yes, it was. I lived in L.A. from 1969-88 and air quality improved dramatically in that time. mnhtnbb Sep 2014 #34
sure was shanti Sep 2014 #55
It really has improved. herding cats Sep 2014 #16
Auto electronic ignition, catalytic converters, unleaded, and EFI. Eleanors38 Sep 2014 #45
I moved to Los Angeles in June of 1982. I use to drive home toward the upaloopa Sep 2014 #54
whose emissions? reddread Sep 2014 #5
Interesting GitRDun Sep 2014 #6
Nice strawman. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #7
lol reddread Sep 2014 #8
The background rad numbers in the Central Valley are thanks to the Sierra's. Xithras Sep 2014 #19
As a bonus, we have high levels of asbestos here in western El Dorado County. Throd Sep 2014 #22
Coalinga and Kettleman Hills. reddread Sep 2014 #26
very interesting, thanks! reddread Sep 2014 #23
The door to conspiracy theory land is 46 feet down to the left, the far left LOL snooper2 Sep 2014 #42
Our heavy industry has been decimated. amandabeech Sep 2014 #9
not really reddread Sep 2014 #12
Yes, some has moved to Mexico, but not all of it is on the border. amandabeech Sep 2014 #15
and we get their pollution reddread Sep 2014 #21
We're number 1!! Xithras Sep 2014 #13
I drove from LA to Sacramento last week. The air along the 5 in Kern County was horrible. Throd Sep 2014 #14
i have never ever seen anything like the dawn sky over Bakersfield one morning reddread Sep 2014 #20
Like the L.A. Basin............ Capt.Rocky300 Sep 2014 #28
A good portion of that pollution Le Taz Hot Sep 2014 #17
half of the top 20 worst cities for air pollution are in India kwassa Sep 2014 #18
another article on immediate predicaments reddread Sep 2014 #24
Some of the numbers don't mean much. former9thward Sep 2014 #25
I was having lunch with some RWs the other day and one spoke up and said we need to stop with Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #27
I live at 1800 feet and on a clear night I can see several of the valley cities tularetom Sep 2014 #29
Missoula, Montana has that air inversion problem too...when the pulp mills were allowed LiberalLoner Sep 2014 #30
The list is bullshit; we have *exported* our pollution to China, Mexico, elsewhere. Romulox Sep 2014 #36
We may have exported a portion of our pollution to China, Mexico GitRDun Sep 2014 #37
What point are you trying to argue? You segued from pollution to neoliberal clap-trap. Romulox Sep 2014 #38
"no jobs, no pollution"? reddread Sep 2014 #40
Outsourcing our industry has greater GREATER pollution, by exporting jobs to low regulation Romulox Sep 2014 #57
I am saying your point is wrong GitRDun Sep 2014 #49
OUR consumption drives overseas pollution, which is GREATER than it would be if we Romulox Sep 2014 #56
OUR consumption drives overseas pollution? GitRDun Sep 2014 #58
Spare me your Galtian garbage. You're a waste of time. nt Romulox Sep 2014 #59
Welcome to the ignore list GitRDun Sep 2014 #60
Sorry, but your ridiculous Right Wing nonsense isn't convincing. Your username surely doesn't help. Romulox Sep 2014 #61
I would not consider pm 2.5 to be a good indicator of pollution levels badtoworse Sep 2014 #39
the skew is the screws put by local politicians reddread Sep 2014 #41
You're missing the point badtoworse Sep 2014 #44
its the smaller stuff that gets ya, so we best pay attention reddread Sep 2014 #50
the real problem reddread Sep 2014 #53
I'll look around for that. GitRDun Sep 2014 #43
I disagree with your assertion that pm 2.5 is not a good measure of air quality. greatlaurel Sep 2014 #46
I found a ranking list you were interested in GitRDun Sep 2014 #47
Pollution regulation in the US was not a major cause of job moving overseas. greatlaurel Sep 2014 #48
I said "is one of the reasons the jobs left" not a major reason. GitRDun Sep 2014 #51
you should tell that to Fender reddread Sep 2014 #52
We import most of what we use each day. US consumers cause pollution in China, by buying Romulox Sep 2014 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The most air pollution is...»Reply #10