Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
41. It was the era as well.
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 10:40 AM
Sep 2014

For the last decade, America had watched their sons drafted, and taken off to war. They saw the horror on the nightly news. Young men, boys really, cut to pieces with bullets, bombs, and other horrors. They saw the veterans returning, limbless and or crippled. A young life cut short by death, by dismemberment. Plus there was the psychological scars that they would be dealing with for decades, or even forever.

The idea that young women would also be subjected to such horror was in itself horrifying. It was bad enough that our boys were going, but the idea of our girls was just too much. While it was mentioned only briefly, no one wanted to imagine their daughters, sisters, or the young women of the nation brutally gang raped if they were captured. A special hell that the men did not face for the most part. As awful as the POW experience was, and we were getting some idea by this time, we could not imagine it for a young woman.

That alone was enough to make people pause. Yes, we wanted equality for our women in the workplace. The nation however, did not want to see that equality subject the young women to horrors that we had grown reluctant to have our young men endure.

Unisex bathrooms were another horror. Women had been ogled enough by the time they reached voting age. Remember, this was the era where Separate but Equal was finally discredited. They could well imagine a court deciding some obscure case that made it a crime to have bathrooms for separate sexes, because there was an amendment that said that the women were equal in every way imaginable.

But mostly, it was the draft, and the all too fresh images of Viet-Nam. The televised war brought the truth to the people, there was no glory on the field of battle. There was only horror to be found there.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you see THAT list of what Schlafly was trying to stop? laserhaas Sep 2014 #1
Schafly did a lot, but, alone, she would have become a laughingstock. merrily Sep 2014 #2
Yes. It had a 10 year expiration date (in the video). laserhaas Sep 2014 #3
"It should be a 2016 agenda to ratify and/or anew!" merrily Sep 2014 #10
Schlafly was a sell out. She is an attorney and worker in many other issues; but laserhaas Sep 2014 #5
No argument here, but she did not defeat the ERA by her lonesome. merrily Sep 2014 #11
That list of talking points is not what she was trying to accomplish. Orsino Sep 2014 #4
I don't disagree. Be that as it may - the "list" makes her look pretty figgn stupid (now). laserhaas Sep 2014 #6
Conservatives don't care to make stupid reasons AZ Progressive Sep 2014 #13
Yeah, those bugbears she used to frighten the rubes... Orsino Sep 2014 #19
I would say more Republican and religious right strength is what she was fighting for. merrily Sep 2014 #12
And in the longest view, aristocracy was her goal. Orsino Sep 2014 #20
As in "here come the aristocrats?" merrily Sep 2014 #23
Schlafly is still alive and her son founded a conservative website on Wiki. laserhaas Sep 2014 #24
Yes, I know, thanks. merrily Sep 2014 #27
I corrected the title; once you all discussed the overlook laserhaas Sep 2014 #28
No poster is always perfect. merrily Sep 2014 #29
The ERA was ratified by Congress in 1972. tritsofme Sep 2014 #7
HUH!?!? - Contradiction in statements laserhaas Sep 2014 #8
Semantics. tritsofme Sep 2014 #14
It was passed by Congress. merrily Sep 2014 #15
Yes, I misused the term. tritsofme Sep 2014 #16
So did the OP, but I think there is enough blame to go around. merrily Sep 2014 #17
Congress definitely deserves blame for never passing it again. tritsofme Sep 2014 #21
Maybe, but Congress hadn't given every amendment an expiration date. merrily Sep 2014 #22
That's a profound statement "we are not a sane nation--" laserhaas Sep 2014 #25
I didn't realize it would make an impression. merrily Sep 2014 #26
Schafly fucked over women for decades to come AZ Progressive Sep 2014 #9
The "radical" Sixties--that fought nonviolently for equal rights for African Americans merrily Sep 2014 #18
The uprise against Vietnam War; was solely due to the fact of the draft. laserhaas Sep 2014 #30
Solely? Is that why Muhammed Ali chose jail after he got drafted? merrily Sep 2014 #31
You are speaking of one person (who actually was convicted for refusing the draft). laserhaas Sep 2014 #34
Ali was one person, but thousands protested that war because it was merrily Sep 2014 #36
Actually, Schlafly was positioned to lose her battle, until the Houston Conferences. TheBlackAdder Sep 2014 #32
I'm going to research the actual(s) more. (Which states rescinded - which ones were never on board). laserhaas Sep 2014 #35
Hard to know who was worse... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2014 #33
Why choose only one? Twofers are free. So are multiples. merrily Sep 2014 #37
I attended that Rally unapatriciated Sep 2014 #38
Thanks Much - for your posting and link laserhaas Sep 2014 #40
I don't need to LibertyLover Sep 2014 #39
It was the era as well. Savannahmann Sep 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Equals Rights Amendment N...»Reply #41