Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(53,402 posts)
1. that isn't an unreasonable defense in a state that requires the wearing of seatbelts
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 07:46 PM
Sep 2014

that certainly shouldn't absolve WalMart of all damages but it might well mitigate the damages. On edit: Is it against the law to not wear a seat belt in a limo? I know they aren't on school buses and are often not on commercial buses either so they might not be in limos.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Walmart Faults Tracy Morg...»Reply #1