Greenwald proves some suckers will believe anything!

[wandy]

105. I have found this to be a common factor over much...........

of the current Right Wing propaganda. It is as If a "master copy" containing critical keywords and objectives is created and then various outlets are asked to 'put it in their own words' retaining the overall message and as many of the hard hitting key words (dog whistles) as possible.

In the script "Diseases of the Twelve Year Old Terrorists", the ailments brought by children across the southern border appears as an ordered list with each ailment having a fixed place in the news item.

No matter who presented and had independent first friend of a friend knowledge, "Josies's Tale" (the account of the attack on Officer Darren Wilson) the keywords "bum-rushes" and "Punches him in the face" were always used.
Now when was the last time you heard the expression "bum-rushes" used in every day speach. It was used by every friend of a friend or person in position of authority who wished to remain anomalous.

I imagine that at first the story of the murder of Michael Brown did not appear as important as proving that Obama lied us into war so stop complaining about how Bush lied us into war.
The "Obama lied us into war" tale is important enough to involve heavy hitters such as Limbaugh, McCarthy and Greenwald.

Using Josie's tale I tried to document the progression of RW propaganda here.......
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025400792

As this story appears to be gaining Benghazi like traction on the RW Bull Shit hit parade, I should probably collect my notes and put them in an OP to be appended as new events unfold. Who knows, this story could be as important as the "Blue Dress" for the repeat of the Clinton game plan.