Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
3. Neoliberalism
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 06:22 AM
Sep 2014

"Neo-liberalism" is a set of economic policies that have become widespread during the last 25 years or so. Although the word is rarely heard in the United States, you can clearly see the effects of neo-liberalism here as the rich grow richer and the poor grow poorer.





A memorable definition of this process came from Subcomandante Marcos at the Zapatista-sponsored Encuentro Intercontinental por la Humanidad y contra el Neo-liberalismo (Inter-continental Encounter for Humanity and Against Neo-liberalism) of August 1996 in Chiapas when he said: "what the Right offers is to turn the world into one big mall where they can buy Indians here, women there ...." and he might have added, children, immigrants, workers or even a whole country like Mexico."

The main points of neo-liberalism include:

THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much.

CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business.

DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job.

PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.

ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy."

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Neoliberalism? vlyons Sep 2014 #1
Neoliberalism is another name for radical free market capitalism gollygee Sep 2014 #2
If it has "Neo" in front of it liberalmike27 Sep 2014 #6
hmm gollygee Sep 2014 #7
Neoliberalism Ichingcarpenter Sep 2014 #3
I'm convinced the "neo" part means "for corporations" - TBF Sep 2014 #4
Yup. Neoconservative...neoliberal.... woo me with science Sep 2014 #17
Do you live in the US and watch US corporate media? Taitertots Sep 2014 #20
I have seen this at work in my own office for sure! Alliances to attack the employee closest Dustlawyer Sep 2014 #5
Got to agree. Social democratic policies, like in most of Europe, reward constructive traits. pampango Sep 2014 #8
As long as they have the US military to take care of every problem The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #11
Europe spends about 1.5% of GDP on the military which is about the same as Canada (1.3%). pampango Sep 2014 #12
Some emulate, most capitulate and few remediate. raouldukelives Sep 2014 #9
sounds more like capitalism than neoliberalism geek tragedy Sep 2014 #10
good article--out of Britain marions ghost Sep 2014 #13
neo liberalism has been defined thousands of times Ichingcarpenter Sep 2014 #14
I prefer "disaster capitalism" --for sure marions ghost Sep 2014 #15
K&R When the words "moderate" and "centrist" become bloody surrealism. woo me with science Sep 2014 #16
kick woo me with science Sep 2014 #18
Psychopaths belong in mental institutions, moondust Sep 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Neoliberalism has brought...»Reply #3