Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
61. +1 Pay attention to the patterns.
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 02:40 PM
Sep 2014

Watch the responses to corporate and predatory policies.
There are a lot of gov't employees who enjoy their 'special powers of secrecy' Purveyor Sep 2014 #1
+1 nashville_brook Sep 2014 #4
not only govt, but PR folks from all corners... nashville_brook Sep 2014 #7
Can I have a list, please? Or can you at least alert Skinner? nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #9
Why would I alert Skinner? As far as I know it is not a TOS violation to work Purveyor Sep 2014 #15
Then can we have a list of who you think works for the government? nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #18
Oh yeah, like that is going happen so you can mash on the alert button... Purveyor Sep 2014 #89
Why would I alert on utter hilarity? Look, I quoted Caddyshack to Manny, got hid. msanthrope Sep 2014 #107
Oh, I'd bet a nickle those on the list already have the list Android3.14 Sep 2014 #103
Don't forget Andy823 Sep 2014 #10
You Better Believe It! nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #13
It sort of smells like Jane Hamsher around this time of midterms, doesn't it? LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #24
There are a lot of Rand Paul supporters posting 'secretly' to further their agenda blm Sep 2014 #20
+1 Government, party... woo me with science Sep 2014 #23
There are people who invent conspiracy theories geek tragedy Sep 2014 #117
States that build surveillance machines woo me with science Sep 2014 #2
Thank you. Great post. Ed Suspicious Sep 2014 #100
Right. You don't have an opinion. Sounds like you do. randome Sep 2014 #3
I have a feeling my FATCA/Greenwald prediction will be coming true....he's msanthrope Sep 2014 #16
I've been waiting for that hammer to fall, too, since you mentioned it many months ago. randome Sep 2014 #22
Maybe Pierre paid off the liens....but he'll have to file taxes from now on. nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #28
Greenwald doesn't screw up to those who worship the ground he walks on? blm Sep 2014 #5
Good post. Andy823 Sep 2014 #17
Now I'm COINTELPRO? Jeebus, where's my check from the NSA? nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #6
You should be weirded out. More than that, woo me with science Sep 2014 #8
Woo, if you find DU to be part of the propaganda state, then why are you participating in it? msanthrope Sep 2014 #12
Good question. Andy823 Sep 2014 #21
Especially if they thought the site was infiltrated by the CIA and the like. I mean, really. nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #26
Yep Andy823 Sep 2014 #35
Who knew we were that important? nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #43
This is where the eyeballs are Fred Friendlier Sep 2014 #69
Love it or leave it? Z_California Sep 2014 #99
this is why i go on about my ignore list bobduca Sep 2014 #111
I just transmitted a super-secret-encrypted message to HQ. greatauntoftriplets Sep 2014 #101
"The eagle has landed, the fat man walks alone!" nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #105
When posting about Greeny we get paid double, the CIA and FBI have him as the greatest threat snooper2 Sep 2014 #77
I haven't gotten a check in over a month! zappaman Sep 2014 #81
When you log into the HR tools click on employee essentials snooper2 Sep 2014 #88
there's a case to be made for not allowing it here Enrique Sep 2014 #11
Interesting. Andy823 Sep 2014 #25
they have banned people for that Enrique Sep 2014 #41
sadly, ad hominem attacks have proven a fairly effective way to divert discussions here KurtNYC Sep 2014 #14
Greenwald is a Libertarian. MohRokTah Sep 2014 #19
"This is a recording." RufusTFirefly Sep 2014 #42
As someone posted on another thread ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #68
Or, there is no conspiracy, and no need to wear tinfoil hats hueymahl Sep 2014 #78
If you think these accusations are unfounded ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #82
And if you do think these accusations were well founded DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2014 #123
ALCOA! FSogol Sep 2014 #27
I am soooo stealing that!!! Of course, the corporatist in me now wants to go buy stocks msanthrope Sep 2014 #30
Just remember, the supporters of the Democratic Party and the Democratic Administration on FSogol Sep 2014 #37
Well, being pro-Obama is a sure sign that you are a paid corporatist. Though what company is paying msanthrope Sep 2014 #112
Greenwald is a proven liar. PROVEN. LIAR. He flat out lied about his partner getting hauled in KittyWampus Sep 2014 #29
O.o daredtowork Sep 2014 #36
He was carrying stolen British Intelligence materials through Britain. Yes....that is a chargeable msanthrope Sep 2014 #50
YOU are the one "framing" things. Greenwald LIED. He unequivocally lied about his partner. KittyWampus Sep 2014 #53
O.o daredtowork Sep 2014 #92
You are the one "slanting" things. Claiming someone is detained without a lawyer KittyWampus Sep 2014 #94
If you were in legal trouble daredtowork Sep 2014 #96
Note the immediate, familiar swarm. woo me with science Sep 2014 #31
Would you kindly identify who you think is part of this swarm? Also, you didn't answer my msanthrope Sep 2014 #34
Swarm defined ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #72
I only see 9 responses Capt. Obvious Sep 2014 #40
+1 Enthusiast Sep 2014 #79
Attacking the messenger Aerows Sep 2014 #32
Although I may not hold Greenwald in highest regard, I do not attack the person.......... wandy Sep 2014 #48
Doesn't matter what he did before. What he's doing now is bad. jeff47 Sep 2014 #33
Then that should be the criticism daredtowork Sep 2014 #45
It is the criticism jeff47 Sep 2014 #52
So you can see that overthetop attacks on Greenwald make you instinctively blm Sep 2014 #58
+1,000,000 nt Andy823 Sep 2014 #93
No he's not claiming Khorasan was the justification... KoKo Sep 2014 #65
Try looking at the article in the Intercept. jeff47 Sep 2014 #70
You need to think about the article at the "Intercept" a little more... KoKo Sep 2014 #113
The anti-Greenwald group has been an amazing feature of DU for a year and a bit muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #38
Nothing mysterious about it. randome Sep 2014 #47
Pretty broad brush, m.... blm Sep 2014 #51
I have never noticed you among the "Greenwald is the Antichrist" movement muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #56
I'm not part of either. But, this OP screamed for the logic mirror to be hoisted. blm Sep 2014 #63
Just in case my own politics aren't clear daredtowork Sep 2014 #108
Spot on. Puglover Sep 2014 #59
It's been going on a lot longer than that. Who could forget the thread about Greenwald opposing seaglass Sep 2014 #124
I for one am not attacking Glenn Greenwald............ wandy Sep 2014 #39
Note the names involved. WilliamPitt Sep 2014 #44
Yes. And life is too damn short. RufusTFirefly Sep 2014 #54
+1 Pay attention to the patterns. woo me with science Sep 2014 #61
yes, that is the connection G_j Sep 2014 #67
A fun link to have nearby while watching the show: woo me with science Sep 2014 #83
oh, that is fun G_j Sep 2014 #90
good website. thanks bbgrunt Sep 2014 #114
Patterns, you mean like chemtrails and stuff? LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #76
You got that right! Andy823 Sep 2014 #98
That's exactly what an authoritarian NSA lackey would say to catch us all off guard! randome Sep 2014 #116
K&R 99Forever Sep 2014 #46
I have most of those people on the ignore list, and my DU experience is greatly improved for it. Maedhros Sep 2014 #49
Yes. I kept thinking some would come around. Clearly a fool's errand. n/t RufusTFirefly Sep 2014 #57
The OP'er's resonse in #36 of this thread proves there is an agenda involved here. KittyWampus Sep 2014 #55
Go back to bed. WilliamPitt Sep 2014 #66
Is that simple rudeness, or is there a hidden meaning in that remark? nt MADem Sep 2014 #115
He says that a lot MADem. sheshe2 Sep 2014 #121
Agreed. nt stevenleser Sep 2014 #87
You might wanna delete this post, it smells like "disruptive META" to me. MADem Sep 2014 #60
There's one of the odd anti-Greenwald claims - that a writer writing a book for royalties is evil muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #73
No no no--if you are a "reporter" you get paid a salary and you "report." MADem Sep 2014 #75
I thought you had a vague idea of what journalism is about muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #84
But he wasn't freelance. He worked in a salaried position for MADem Sep 2014 #97
Greenwald also took a quarter billion to start a news outlet. So it isn't just about book royalties. KittyWampus Sep 2014 #95
I'm not Defending Greenwald's Current Actions daredtowork Sep 2014 #80
You are accusing DUers of all sorts of horrible things in your OP, though. MADem Sep 2014 #104
I'm Not a Greenwald Partisan daredtowork Sep 2014 #119
I didn't see the OP accusing anyone of what you said. KoKo Sep 2014 #86
Notwithstanding the unintentional Betsy Ross reference, here you go: MADem Sep 2014 #109
It's not me you need to convince about the OP, it's the hosts muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #120
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Sep 2014 #62
If Bush was still in the WH, DU would send GG flowers n/t leftstreet Sep 2014 #64
In the end, none of it matters. randome Sep 2014 #71
“News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising.” Lord Northcliffe Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #74
And Robert Parry. And Michael Moore. It's embarrassing nt Teamster Jeff Sep 2014 #85
NSA trolls? Let them yak... :) Helen Borg Sep 2014 #91
Weirded out by all the support for a Kochs brothers libertarian by supposed progressives. n/t pnwmom Sep 2014 #102
I like the Greenwald detractors even less than I like Greenwald Bluenorthwest Sep 2014 #106
As a Libertarian, this kind of confusion and defending is exactly what Greenwald Tikki Sep 2014 #110
Concerted effort to silence opposition to Big War & The Money Hoarders. Noted by Their silence on grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #118
Greenwald seems to cause a lot of people to become unhinged. The lie that he’s a libertarian is Chathamization Sep 2014 #122
Locking as disruptive meta. cbayer Sep 2014 #125
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Weirded Out By All the At...»Reply #61