Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 06:39 AM Oct 2014

What's going on in the White House? Or It's competence, stupid. [View all]

As someone who believes that government can be a force for good, someone who voted twice for, who donated to and worked for Barak Obama, and wants him to succeed I am becoming increasingly disturbed by what seems to be sheer incompetence on the part of his administration, which makes me think, unfortunately, that our President, who is a man with great rhetorical gifts and a humane and decent vision of where this country should be is a lousy manager.

Mind you, it's not his job to call the White House's maintenance department to fix the door alarm. It is his job to appoint a someone whose job it is to make sure that the head of White House Operations makes sure that all of this very expensive equipment is in prime working order, that Secret Service agents are on duty when and where they're supposed to be and most importantly, to tell the president things that he is not going to want to hear.

If it was just this, I wouldn't be as concerned but we've seen one thing after another go wrong. The fact that the President was totally blindsided by the fact that his greatest achievement, the Affordable Care Act was about to be turned into a national joke by a malfunctioning website is more evidence that something is seriously wrong in the White House. The fact that the President was completely blindsided by Isis, and seemed to have no clue that going golfing right after responding to the beheading of an American journalist might be fodder for the right wing.

My take on this is that any President needs someone at his side who has the management skills and the willingness to bust heads if he or she has to in order to get the White House on track so that the chief executive is free to concentrate on the big picture. Rahm Emanuel, as much as I disliked his politics, served this purpose in his first term. Since then, things have gone downhill.

I realize that many people will not like what I'm saying, but the truth is that Democrats, the party which believes that government can be a force for good, have got to deliver on that promise. I value good progressive ideas but ideas are not enough if you are not able to implement them well and make them work efficiently and within budget. Yes, the ACA was fixed, kind of sort of, although all too many people are completely unaware of that fact. "Good enough for government work" just doesn't cut it any more.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can't manage people CJCRANE Oct 2014 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Oct 2014 #3
Bushco didn't want to be efficient in the first place. CJCRANE Oct 2014 #4
That's certainly part of it but it's not the whole story. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #7
It's not like this president created the Secret Service . . . brush Oct 2014 #30
My point was that the president needs someone strong to handle these details bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #33
I'm not defending or attacking the pres... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2014 #21
So are you telling us that the President yesiwasacop Oct 2014 #23
The Executive branch is 100% chosen by the President. former9thward Oct 2014 #34
Who holds the purse strings? CJCRANE Oct 2014 #36
No excuse for mismangement. former9thward Oct 2014 #37
+infinity nt newfie11 Oct 2014 #2
Well, ever since they took that big giant S off his chest he become just a man. notadmblnd Oct 2014 #5
If the President is reluctant to kick ass and take names he should hire someone who isn't tularetom Oct 2014 #6
I agree with you on that. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #8
You agree with Politico apparently, that Obama is to blame for the danger geek tragedy Oct 2014 #9
Competence counts. I want the President I voted for to do his job better than he is doing it. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #10
You left out he was "just a community organizer" ... JoePhilly Oct 2014 #12
Thanks, Joe. Feral Child Oct 2014 #15
Right wing word salad. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #14
I suspect things aren't much better or worse than at any other time Schema Thing Oct 2014 #31
You're right, screw ups happen. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #32
Reluctant as I am to agree with Politico about anything tularetom Oct 2014 #11
WOW, blaming Obama for his own assassination. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #13
WOW is right tularetom Oct 2014 #16
You agreed with Politico. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #18
The politico article pointed out problems in the Secret Service. These problems are real. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #22
You and I have nothing to disucss MohRokTah Oct 2014 #25
At work a couple days ago one of my co-workers had RT wing radio on and yesiwasacop Oct 2014 #26
Admittedly there has not anything close to the greatest failures of the Bush administration.. bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #29
Do you find the Secret Service Director's performance acceptable? bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #19
You agreed with Politicoi MohRokTah Oct 2014 #20
I think you're wasting your time trying to introduce logic into this discussion tularetom Oct 2014 #24
Thanks, you're right. So silly of me. nt bklyncowgirl Oct 2014 #27
See my post #15, please. Feral Child Oct 2014 #17
I'm not going to blame the President for the SS failures. Tatiana Oct 2014 #28
Obama appointed a SS Director who was tasked with reforming the SS. former9thward Oct 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's going on in the Wh...