Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
100. AND WE WELCOME THEIR HATRED:
Wed Oct 1, 2014, 10:12 AM
Oct 2014

"For these things, too, and for a multitude of others like them, we have only just begun to fight."

Our Documents: Franklin Roosevelt's Address Announcing the Second New Deal
October 31, 1936

Senator Wagner, Governor Lehman, ladies and gentlemen:

On the eve of a national election, it is well for us to stop for a moment and analyze calmly and without prejudice the effect on our Nation of a victory by either of the major political parties.

The problem of the electorate is far deeper, far more vital than the continuance in the Presidency of any individual. For the greater issue goes beyond units of humanity--it goes to humanity itself.

In 1932 the issue was the restoration of American democracy; and the American people were in a mood to win. They did win. In 1936 the issue is the preservation of their victory. Again they are in a mood to win. Again they will win.

More than four years ago in accepting the Democratic nomination in Chicago, I said: "Give me your help not to win votes alone, but to win in this crusade to restore America to its own people."

The banners of that crusade still fly in the van of a Nation that is on the march.

It is needless to repeat the details of the program which this Administration has been hammering out on the anvils of experience. No amount of misrepresentation or statistical contortion can conceal or blur or smear that record. Neither the attacks of unscrupulous enemies nor the exaggerations of over-zealous friends will serve to mislead the American people.

What was our hope in 1932? Above all other things the American people wanted peace. They wanted peace of mind instead of gnawing fear.

First, they sought escape from the personal terror which had stalked them for three years. They wanted the peace that comes from security in their homes: safety for their savings, permanence in their jobs, a fair profit from their enterprise.

Next, they wanted peace in the community, the peace that springs from the ability to meet the needs of community life: schools, playgrounds, parks, sanitation, highways--those things which are expected of solvent local government. They sought escape from disintegration and bankruptcy in local and state affairs.

They also sought peace within the Nation: protection of their currency, fairer wages, the ending of long hours of toil, the abolition of child labor, the elimination of wild-cat speculation, the safety of their children from kidnappers.

And, finally, they sought peace with other Nations--peace in a world of unrest. The Nation knows that I hate war, and I know that the Nation hates war.

I submit to you a record of peace; and on that record a well-founded expectation for future peace--peace for the individual, peace for the community, peace for the Nation, and peace with the world.

Tonight I call the roll--the roll of honor of those who stood with us in 1932 and still stand with us today.

Written on it are the names of millions who never had a chance --men at starvation wages, women in sweatshops, children at looms.

Written on it are the names of those who despaired, young men and young women for whom opportunity had become a will-o'-the-wisp.

Written on it are the names of farmers whose acres yielded only bitterness, business men whose books were portents of disaster, home owners who were faced with eviction, frugal citizens whose savings were insecure.

Written there in large letters are the names of countless other Americans of all parties and all faiths, Americans who had eyes to see and hearts to understand, whose consciences were burdened because too many of their fellows were burdened, who looked on these things four years ago and said, "This can be changed. We will change it."

We still lead that army in 1936. They stood with us then because in 1932 they believed. They stand with us today because in 1936 they know. And with them stand millions of new recruits who have come to know.

Their hopes have become our record.

We have not come this far without a struggle and I assure you we cannot go further without a struggle.

For twelve years this Nation was afflicted with hear-nothing, see-nothing, do-nothing Government. The Nation looked to Government but the Government looked away. Nine mocking years with the golden calf and three long years of the scourge! Nine crazy years at the ticker and three long years in the breadlines! Nine mad years of mirage and three long years of despair! Powerful influences strive today to restore that kind of government with its doctrine that that Government is best which is most indifferent.

For nearly four years you have had an Administration which instead of twirling its thumbs has rolled up its sleeves. We will keep our sleeves rolled up.

We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace--business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me--and I welcome their hatred.

I should like to have it said of my first Administration that in it the forces of selfishness and of lust for power met their match. I should like to have it said of my second Administration that in it these forces met their master.

The American people know from a four-year record that today there is only one entrance to the White House--by the front door. Since March 4, 1933, there has been only one pass-key to the White House. I have carried that key in my pocket. It is there tonight. So long as I am President, it will remain in my pocket.

Those who used to have pass-keys are not happy. Some of them are desperate. Only desperate men with their backs to the wall would descend so far below the level of decent citizenship as to foster the current pay-envelope campaign against America's working people. Only reckless men, heedless of consequences, would risk the disruption of the hope for a new peace between worker and employer by returning to the tactics of the labor spy.

Here is an amazing paradox! The very employers and politicians and publishers who talk most loudly of class antagonism and the destruction of the American system now undermine that system by this attempt to coerce the votes of the wage earners of this country. It is the 1936 version of the old threat to close down the factory or the office if a particular candidate does not win. It is an old strategy of tyrants to delude their victims into fighting their battles for them.

Every message in a pay envelope, even if it is the truth, is a command to vote according to the will of the employer. But this propaganda is worse- it is deceit.

They tell the worker his wage will be reduced by a contribution to some vague form of old-age insurance. They carefully conceal from him the fact that for every dollar of premium he pays for that insurance, the employer pays another dollar. That omission is deceit.

They carefully conceal from him the fact that under the federal law, he receives another insurance policy to help him if he loses his job, and that the premium of that policy is paid 100 percent by the employer and not one cent by the worker. They do not tell him that the insurance policy that is bought for him is far more favorable to him than any policy that any private insurance company could afford to issue. That omission is deceit.

They imply to him that he pays all the cost of both forms of insurance. They carefully conceal from him the fact that for every dollar put up by him his employer puts up three dollars three for one. And that omission is deceit.

But they are guilty of more than deceit. When they imply that the reserves thus created against both these policies will be stolen by some future Congress, diverted to some wholly foreign purpose, they attack the integrity and honor of American Government itself. Those who suggest that, are already aliens to the spirit of American democracy. Let them emigrate and try their lot under some foreign flag in which they have more confidence.

The fraudulent nature of this attempt is well shown by the record of votes on the passage of the Social Security Act. In addition to an overwhelming majority of Democrats in both Houses, seventy-seven Republican Representatives voted for it and only eighteen against it and fifteen Republican Senators voted for it and only five against it. Where does this last-minute drive of the Republican leadership leave these Republican Representatives and Senators who helped enact this law?

I am sure the vast majority of law-abiding businessmen who are not parties to this propaganda fully appreciate the extent of the threat to honest business contained in this coercion.

I have expressed indignation at this form of campaigning and I am confident that the overwhelming majority of employers, workers and the general public share that indignation and will show it at the polls on Tuesday next.

Aside from this phase of it, I prefer to remember this campaign not as bitter but only as hard-fought. There should be no bitterness or hate where the sole thought is the welfare of the United States of America. No man can occupy the office of President without realizing that he is President of all the people.

It is because I have sought to think in terms of the whole Nation that I am confident that today, just as four years ago, the people want more than promises.

Our vision for the future contains more than promises.

This is our answer to those who, silent about their own plans, ask us to state our objectives.

Of course we will continue to seek to improve working conditions for the workers of America--to reduce hours over-long, to increase wages that spell starvation, to end the labor of children, to wipe out sweatshops. Of course we will continue every effort to end monopoly in business, to support collective bargaining, to stop unfair competition, to abolish dishonorable trade practices. For all these we have only just begun to fight.

Of course we will continue to work for cheaper electricity in the homes and on the farms of America, for better and cheaper transportation, for low interest rates, for sounder home financing, for better banking, for the regulation of security issues, for reciprocal trade among nations, for the wiping out of slums. For all these we have only just begun to fight.

Of course we will continue our efforts in behalf of the farmers of America. With their continued cooperation we will do all in our power to end the piling up of huge surpluses which spelled ruinous prices for their crops. We will persist in successful action for better land use, for reforestation, for the conservation of water all the way from its source to the sea, for drought and flood control, for better marketing facilities for farm commodities, for a definite reduction of farm tenancy, for encouragement of farmer cooperatives, for crop insurance and a stable food supply. For all these we have only just begun to fight.

Of course we will provide useful work for the needy unemployed; we prefer useful work to the pauperism of a dole.

Here and now I want to make myself clear about those who disparage their fellow citizens on the relief rolls. They say that those on relief are not merely jobless--that they are worthless. Their solution for the relief problem is to end relief--to purge the rolls by starvation. To use the language of the stock broker, our needy unemployed would be cared for when, as, and if some fairy godmother should happen on the scene.

You and I will continue to refuse to accept that estimate of our unemployed fellow Americans. Your Government is still on the same side of the street with the Good Samaritan and not with those who pass by on the other side.

Again -- what of our objectives?

Of course we will continue our efforts for young men and women so that they may obtain an education and an opportunity to put it to use. Of course we will continue our help for the crippled, for the blind, for the mothers, our insurance for the unemployed, our security for the aged. Of course we will continue to protect the consumer against unnecessary price spreads, against the costs that are added by monopoly and speculation. We will continue our successful efforts to increase his purchasing power and to keep it constant.

For these things, too, and for a multitude of others like them, we have only just begun to fight.

All this--all these objectives--spell peace at home. All our actions, all our ideals, spell also peace with other nations.

Today there is war and rumor of war. We want none of it. But while we guard our shores against threats of war, we will continue to remove the causes of unrest and antagonism at home which might make our people easier victims to those for whom foreign war is profitable. You know well that those who stand to profit by war are not on our side in this campaign.

"Peace on earth, good will toward men"--democracy must cling to that message. For it is my deep conviction that democracy cannot live without that true religion which gives a nation a sense of justice and of moral purpose. Above our political forums, above our market places stand the altars of our faith-altars on which burn the fires of devotion that maintain all that is best in us and all that is best in our Nation.

We have need of that devotion today. It is that which makes it possible for government to persuade those who are mentally prepared to fight each other to go on instead, to work for and to sacrifice for each other. That is why we need to say with the Prophet: "What doth the Lord require of thee -- but to do justly, to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God." That is why the recovery we seek, the recovery we are winning, is more than economic. In it are included justice and love and humility, not for ourselves as individuals alone, but for our Nation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And one of the most hated by some DUers MannyGoldstein Sep 2014 #1
Well, we do know that the 'Security Contractors' were bidding on contracts to 'smear sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #11
Uh... um... GREENWALD IS A LIBERTARIAN!!! MannyGoldstein Sep 2014 #27
Lol, see what I mean about the smear mongers lack of imagination regarding their talking points sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #104
+1 GREAT post. merrily Oct 2014 #87
It's been mind-blowing to watch them go after Moore, fox news style whatchamacallit Sep 2014 #29
What an amazing honor lame54 Sep 2014 #2
Just watch Fahrenheit 911 and you'll know why. Cleita Sep 2014 #3
In "Fahrenheit" I though the scene with "W" was interesting. Seemed more like a slick talking brewens Oct 2014 #83
oh definitely, want to see some more pre-dumbya speak? reddread Oct 2014 #112
THANKS! Very interesting look at preDimson Bush. nt valerief Oct 2014 #145
I find their comments illuminating reddread Oct 2014 #147
Just another reason to like Michael Moore!! Laf.La.Dem. Sep 2014 #4
Others should be slightly jealous uponit7771 Sep 2014 #5
I'm sure he welcomed their hatred…. dhill926 Sep 2014 #6
He exposed Chimpoleon for exactly what he was hifiguy Sep 2014 #7
and how many votes did Farenheit 9/11 shift? brooklynite Sep 2014 #9
That's because OUR ticket in 2004 SUPPORTED everything Moore's film called out. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #15
You should crucify Kerry a few more times, every chance you get. Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #17
It's not crucifixion to tell the truth. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #18
Evidently you didn't even hear about Ohio's 2004 presidential election results. Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #34
I know about Ohio as much as you do. Don't patronize me. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #40
I highly doubt that. Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #41
OK, I don't know as much about it as your relatives. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #43
There was no Dem strategy against fixed elections. Gore had 51m and Kerry 59m blm Oct 2014 #119
"But Ohio isn't really the point." Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #150
I wasn't "crucifying" Kerry. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #151
LOL! I have relatives in many places. Never dreamt that made me merrily Oct 2014 #92
YOU run a campaign against Bushes and Clintonites and see how you do, Burch. blm Oct 2014 #115
It's not hate, it's disappointment. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #121
LOL - rebuild national party infrastructure AND run a presidential campaign at same time. blm Oct 2014 #125
He could have dismissed McAuliffe. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #128
LOL - It's Fantasy Island to believe a Titanic could easily turn around blm Oct 2014 #133
It's EQUALLY fantasy to think the Titanic could somehow have limped into New York Harbor Ken Burch Oct 2014 #139
Why insist BCCI couldn't be re-opened and Iraq war be drawn down simultaneously? blm Oct 2014 #144
LOL - Tell that to the hawkish Clinton wing of the party you claim didn't exist in 2004. blm Oct 2014 #111
Baloney - You sound like you bought the lazy-minded corporate media's version of 2004. blm Sep 2014 #20
If we were going to keep the Iraq War going, BCCI was meaningless. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #23
Baloney - BCCI is the skeleton key to just about everything that is still going on today. blm Sep 2014 #33
What's a few more pre-conviction pardons, a little MSM play along, a couple of airplane crashes reddread Sep 2014 #39
You are proving to be unable to accept the facts in my post. blm Oct 2014 #105
impeachment? reddread Oct 2014 #110
You think Bush1 gave up presidency to Clinton unwillingly? LOL - blm Oct 2014 #113
not at all reddread Oct 2014 #114
Perhaps you should read the entire exchange - I posted in order of replies blm Oct 2014 #116
yeah, watching Henry Gonzales on C-SPAN all that time reddread Oct 2014 #118
Henry Gonzales was on top of Iraqgate and IranContra links to Iraqgate blm Oct 2014 #122
So what if we left before "the first Iraqi election"? Ken Burch Sep 2014 #42
That's the problem arguing with you - you didn't pay attention then. blm Oct 2014 #55
90 days per Kucinich reddread Oct 2014 #57
As president Dennis Kucinich could NOT fulfill 90 days promise logistically, blm Oct 2014 #103
adamant assertions are still assertions, ANYTHING is possible, except perhaps Kerry saving us reddread Oct 2014 #107
In Nov 2003 there was no election in Iraq scheduled. blm Oct 2014 #109
Again, why are you still so invested in the "Iraqi election"? Ken Burch Oct 2014 #126
And that could have been easily conveyed to the American public blm Oct 2014 #130
ON the stump and in the debates, yes. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #132
Sorry - but you're still wrong. Corpmedia was still pushing blm Oct 2014 #135
Then he should have told Clinton to pound sand. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #138
Sorry, Ken, but your posts are absurd at this point. blm Oct 2014 #148
The "Iraqi election" was a meaningless joke. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #124
Prove it with the poll numbers of the American people at the time. blm Oct 2014 #136
Why do you still pretend that the Iraqi "election" meant anything? Ken Burch Oct 2014 #120
Keep telling yourself that. UN was involved at that point. blm Oct 2014 #146
Moore's film relied on Kerry's investigation of IranContra and BCCI - you think blm Oct 2014 #108
Is that all that matters to you, politics? What all this information has done and continues to do sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #16
& we now have a record for future generations, G_j Sep 2014 #22
The silence included Congressman Bernie Sanders, right? brooklynite Sep 2014 #36
Bernie was in the House at the time what was needed was 1 Senator to go along with the challenge dflprincess Sep 2014 #38
I've read somewhere that not-challenging was negotiated with the GOP, and Dems got more seats Ken Burch Oct 2014 #131
That's interesting dflprincess Oct 2014 #152
Still getting it wrong, eh? RandiFan1290 Oct 2014 #52
Please explain... brooklynite Oct 2014 #53
Moore set an example for all kinds of things. merrily Oct 2014 #90
Um, the OP is about whether Michael Moore was hated by the Bush Administration... brooklynite Sep 2014 #35
on no legs. reddread Sep 2014 #45
In other words, he's "stumped". Ken Burch Oct 2014 #141
After this, therefore because of this... LanternWaste Oct 2014 #99
It did help to rally dispirited Liberals MannyGoldstein Sep 2014 #30
As if you know what the impact of that film was or wasn't. merrily Oct 2014 #89
Boosh should be on our enemies list. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #48
And Phil Donohue would know this, because... brooklynite Sep 2014 #8
Oh? Watch the Colbert stand-up at the WH Correspondents Dinner. hatrack Sep 2014 #13
Yes. rustbeltvoice Sep 2014 #24
How can anybody on the liberal side be anti-Michael Moore? Ken Burch Sep 2014 #19
I'm not "anti", I just don't seem him as politically effective or a danger to the Bush Administratio brooklynite Sep 2014 #37
Really? Well, you are not Bush/Cheney. And you must not have been around sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #46
Funny..I just went down to my local theater to watch it... brooklynite Oct 2014 #54
hope you enjoyed my eyeroll reddread Oct 2014 #59
Lucky you. We were told there were threats against the local theater so it might be wise sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #106
The Bushies have been out of office since 2008. Ken Burch Oct 2014 #142
I don't care... brooklynite Oct 2014 #143
I have to agree JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #50
because you failed to stop it. reddread Oct 2014 #60
Are you serious? JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #66
you can blame Moore, I can blame you reddread Oct 2014 #67
When did I blame Moore? JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #71
"If he was so effective - then why did we have 8 years of the Appointed One instead of four?" reddread Oct 2014 #72
Again you are being a silly sophomore JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #76
and they didnt hate him. noooo reddread Oct 2014 #81
If Audie Murphy was such a big war hero, Jackpine Radical Oct 2014 #102
Because our party ran an incompetent, deferential, defeatist campaign in 2004 Ken Burch Oct 2014 #134
resistance is futile. accountability is "off the table" reddread Oct 2014 #137
The poster I'm arguing with in this exchange Ken Burch Oct 2014 #140
That is not close to a fair standard for a film, JG, esp. when we let Kerry off the hook. merrily Oct 2014 #95
Apparently, you should have assured the Bush White House about that. merrily Oct 2014 #94
theres the rub reddread Oct 2014 #58
Dan Rather was the most hated by Bush the elder. grasswire Sep 2014 #10
They sure showed him he had something to fear. merrily Oct 2014 #91
yes, much later grasswire Oct 2014 #117
Payback for his story on Dubya's desertion from the Texas Air whatever. merrily Oct 2014 #123
much, much earlier, Rather went after Bush senior. grasswire Oct 2014 #127
Lee Atwater was one POS. Everyone who thinks Poppy is so merrily Oct 2014 #129
Michael Moore is very fat and he lives in a big house!!11!! QC Sep 2014 #12
Get with the program- He's a known Racist n2doc Sep 2014 #21
Oh yeah! I guess Moore's evil was so devastating QC Oct 2014 #63
Not only a known racist Puglover Oct 2014 #75
He's fat, too. That makes him even worse! n/t QC Oct 2014 #78
That's so last week. Today, it's that Bush got re-elected, so Moore is merrily Oct 2014 #96
Makes sense. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #14
Yes, only after Paul Wellstone died. Octafish Sep 2014 #25
they put Jesse Jackson away on Day One reddread Sep 2014 #32
Eh I think that was actually JustAnotherGen Sep 2014 #26
why, do you think they felt threatened by Hussein? reddread Sep 2014 #44
They didn't JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #49
why would they hate him? reddread Oct 2014 #56
Listen JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #64
You best take issue with Phil Donahue, not the OP reddread Oct 2014 #68
Nope I take issue with the OP for posting it. JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #74
thats not logical reddread Oct 2014 #77
Ahh - there it is . . . JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #84
one for Phil and Mike, tied to the tracks when a bus couldnt be found reddread Oct 2014 #88
I'm confused G_j Oct 2014 #79
Your buddy is the one JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #82
you keep mentioning the OP G_j Oct 2014 #85
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #86
hey now reddread Oct 2014 #93
lol G_j Oct 2014 #97
historical basis? reddread Oct 2014 #98
As well as DU's Party Faithful. n/t Le Taz Hot Sep 2014 #28
Some folks here hate him as well malaise Sep 2014 #31
a long list of hated staunch Bush opponents in these parts reddread Oct 2014 #62
Partisans are partisans every where on the planet malaise Oct 2014 #65
hilarious from another planet maybe reddread Oct 2014 #69
In a cynical way it is funny watching them malaise Oct 2014 #70
My Hero libodem Oct 2014 #47
The trolls swarmed DU when F911 came out. RandiFan1290 Oct 2014 #51
yeah, bring up JFK and you get the same routines reddread Oct 2014 #73
I remember that JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #80
He is much hated by the local Loyalty Brigade, too. QC Oct 2014 #61
AND WE WELCOME THEIR HATRED: grahamhgreen Oct 2014 #100
I guess that Secretary Donohue would know better than anyone. n/t Orsino Oct 2014 #101
Michael Moore was the first one to courageously take on the samsingh Oct 2014 #149
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Moore was the per...»Reply #100