Freeper: Romney "means well...any damage he does will be (a) less and (b) an unintended consequence"

[Amerigo Vespucci]

7. He hasn't yet...

The post is still there...and there are a few replies:

To: ExGeeEye

I agree in that Romney is probably a well-intentioned socialist, but he is still a socialist... to simplify things even more, a socialist that loves to work is more damaging than a socialist that hates to work. If you think it is bad now, just wait until Willard shakes that etch a sketch after Labor Day.

8 posted on Friday, April 13, 2012 5:40:18 AM by wolfman23601

***

To: ExGeeEye

Agreed, but it’s real hard to vote when the choice is between a socialist and a communist - BOTH are bad, just one is worse sooner.

21 posted on Friday, April 13, 2012 6:09:05 AM by ctdonath2

***

To: ExGeeEye

If you think Mitt Romney is the one who can save America, or even slow its decline, I think you’re sorely mistaken.

Virgil Goode would get my support any day of the week. I’d hope he’d at least use some of it to redesign his web site, though; it’s downright embarrassing compared to almost any other candidate’s.

23 posted on Friday, April 13, 2012 6:22:34 AM by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)