General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ben Affleck vs. Bill Maher on Islam: Bill's right. [View all]True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)As the jihadis had the strongest clandestine network and supplies, rebels increasingly had to reach accommodations with them or eventually join them. Over time they became ideologically radicalized through long association and mutual support. In other words, Syria is one instance where inaction on our part was the problem.
And it's not like we didn't have justification to support the rebels, given that Putin was supporting Assad with advanced weaponry - the rules of balance permitted us to arm the rebels, but we were so terrified of creating ISIS that our timidity actually made it happen anyway. Foreign policy is not simple.
But more importantly, the point of this discussion here isn't about forms of government, it's about the attitudes of the people. The only reason that toppling a despot would bring about such internecine religious chaos and violence is that the current state of Islam is profoundly authoritarian and intolerant, and you would have to drastically move the goalposts of morality in order to claim that that's not the case.