Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

dsc

(53,363 posts)
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 07:54 AM Apr 2012

Regardless of one's opinion of Edwards, Maddow did a great service last night with her story [View all]

I live in Raleigh NC, which is where the US attorney who pursued this case, served. He is now running to be a Congressman from the Raleigh area in a newly drawn GOP friendly district (he would replace Brad Miller if he were to win). One of his biggest arguments to vote for him, his prosecution of Edwards and other Democratic office holders (yes Edwards isn't the first). He previously went after our governor on a whole host of things and ended up with a plea for some mickey mouse reporting requirement. He also prosecuted an agriculture secretary and a Congressman. All Democrats fancy that.

Now we have Edwards. The criminal case here is that two wealthy donors to Edwards used 900,000 to support Reille and Young in order to further his campaign instead of to merely help out a friend. The first reason makes it an illegal campaign contribution (which wouldn't be illegal now BTW) the second makes it a perfectly legal gift. Let me repeat this, if they gifted the 900k to Edwards because they liked him and wanted to help him keep this woman away to say save his marriage, then it is a legal gift. In every other case of illegal campaign contributions where there is literally no evidence whatsoever of a quid pro quo, the campaign pays a fine and makes it a day. Yet in this one case, out of literally thousands and thousands, which just happens to be of the most famous adulterer in the land, and just happens to have fallen into the lap of a man who wants to be a US Congressman, this case makes it to court. Maybe you are so mad at Edwards you don't give a damn about how federal law is and isn't enforced in NC, but I live here, and I do care. Maddow, thank you for telling the nation, our story.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
She did a great job last night. madaboutharry Apr 2012 #1
Melanie Sloan (Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington--CREW) essentially has said hlthe2b Apr 2012 #2
du rec. nt xchrom Apr 2012 #3
Very interesting. JNelson6563 Apr 2012 #4
Thank you for posting. DURHAM D Apr 2012 #5
democrats in NC barbtries Apr 2012 #6
republicans gained control of our state legislature last term for the 1st time Lex Apr 2012 #25
absolutely a menace. barbtries Apr 2012 #27
A nearly million dollar gift? To a multi millionaire? Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #7
Just one thing... whathehell Apr 2012 #9
Her salary starts at 2.2 million a year. I did not say she was as rich as John, just that Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #14
Okay.. whathehell Apr 2012 #23
Reread the title of the post, please. 12AngryBorneoWildmen Apr 2012 #11
thank you SemperEadem Apr 2012 #13
John Edwards is a lying hate monger and hypocrite. Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #16
Well I just Want to Make Sure liberalmike27 Apr 2012 #17
that is apparent SemperEadem Apr 2012 #19
One of those still too bitter to get the point? aquart Apr 2012 #38
The only thing I ask myself about John Edwards is Loki Apr 2012 #8
He's using the Tom DeLay Defense Lasher Apr 2012 #24
Yes, she did. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #10
I live in NC. And I care, too. Mira Apr 2012 #12
very insightful SemperEadem Apr 2012 #15
Thank you for putting this additional information up. Cerridwen Apr 2012 #18
Kay Hagen (D-NC) was in no hurry to replace George Holding either DefenseLawyer Apr 2012 #20
Question for you. If you don't mind..... Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2012 #21
In fairness they would be legal if spent without Edwards consultation dsc Apr 2012 #26
Thanks for mentioning Siegelman. patrice Apr 2012 #22
It shouldn't be the business of the courts to go into how a campaign spends it's money. RB TexLa Apr 2012 #28
No matter how much I detest someone fightforfreedom123 Apr 2012 #29
proud/amazed rec# 81! wow, wonder how many would *love* to unrec this! lol inna Apr 2012 #30
so many people mistakenly believe that it was *their* contributions inna Apr 2012 #31
Wonder how long will it take to get the dirt out of attorney Thinkingabout Apr 2012 #32
Edwards actually talked about poverty and the reasons for our failing economy-- JDPriestly Apr 2012 #33
yes, and his talk got him special attention dougolat Apr 2012 #39
From day one this was a scripted attack of what Edwards represented as a candidate. Ford_Prefect Apr 2012 #34
Agree totally. Holding is a piece of work unc70 Apr 2012 #35
or, he could have had the decency to use his own dough for hush money... dionysus Apr 2012 #36
It would have been hard to hide that from Elizabeth unc70 Apr 2012 #37
Edwards is pond scum, for many reasons. But I agree with your central point. Stinky The Clown Apr 2012 #40
Opposition research had this info immediately unc70 Apr 2012 #41
Did she say whether the generous two reported the gifts to the IRS & paid the requisite gift taxes? Egalitariat Apr 2012 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regardless of one's opini...