General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ben Affleck vs. Bill Maher on Islam: Bill's right. [View all]True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)It was argument-by-anecdote, and a blatant ploy to bury the discussion in infinite detail. If I were to show Indonesia were a bastion of religious oppression (I don't know either way), the next tactic would be to simply move on to another "moderate" Islamic country and demand that I write a treatise about it; if that one proved my point, then another; and another.
And if I showed that every single Islamic country were brutally oppressive (they're not, of course - not all of them, anyway), then the tactic would be to bring up individual Muslims in those countries who had said something liberal once and weren't instantly murdered for it, thus "proving" that Pakistan is actually just like Canada, and only a raging Islamophobe would think otherwise.
Without even addressing the facts I presented in the OP, they would demand an infinite regression of additional details while conceding nothing and doing no work themselves to justify their own position.
The tactics of dishonesty are a well-mapped path. Don't waste my time.