Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Vote for Hillary? Can't Get Fooled Again [View all]
...or can we?......
Leave it to that celebrated American statesman, George W. Bush, to give eloquence to the thought: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me . . . you can't get fooled again."
<snip>
Speaking of getting fooled, what sane person would ever vote for Hillary Clinton for president? Honestly, wouldn't that be like voting for Barack Obama in 2008 all over again -- as if his presidency had never happened -- as if we hadn't already experienced the deceitful pirouette from populist rhetoric to corporate governance. What idiot would allow herself to be conned into voting for someone who says one thing but who does the opposite, after having been conned into voting for someone who said and did the exact same thing once already?
[In 2008] Voters had a candidate who actually talked like a populist, on one side, and cranky old John McCain, on the other, a guy known mostly for wanting to blow things up, including several of his own planes, but mostly he wanted to bomb Iran. Because it's such a catchy tune. And who doesn't like the smell of napalm in the morning?
The populist won in a landslide. (The land didn't actually slide. It's just that, at the time, when the election results were finally announced, some of us could swear the earth had moved. Young and old were filled with the audacity of hope. )
Then someone turned the lights on.
Once in power the populist ditched the disguise and became what he had always been -- a slick talking snake-oil salesman who'd no more "walk with unions" than have tea with Assad. Say one thing. Do another. Lie in between. Help rebuild Baghdad but dodge on Detroit. Bail out banksters but bail on homeowners. Escalate wars of aggression. Expand drone killings. Give more tax breaks to the wealthy. Offer cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medical.
<snip>
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Vote-for-Hillary-Can-t-Ge-by-BK-Faunce-Budget_Culture_Democrat_Democratic-141005-480.html?show=votes#allcomments
<snip>
Speaking of getting fooled, what sane person would ever vote for Hillary Clinton for president? Honestly, wouldn't that be like voting for Barack Obama in 2008 all over again -- as if his presidency had never happened -- as if we hadn't already experienced the deceitful pirouette from populist rhetoric to corporate governance. What idiot would allow herself to be conned into voting for someone who says one thing but who does the opposite, after having been conned into voting for someone who said and did the exact same thing once already?
[In 2008] Voters had a candidate who actually talked like a populist, on one side, and cranky old John McCain, on the other, a guy known mostly for wanting to blow things up, including several of his own planes, but mostly he wanted to bomb Iran. Because it's such a catchy tune. And who doesn't like the smell of napalm in the morning?
The populist won in a landslide. (The land didn't actually slide. It's just that, at the time, when the election results were finally announced, some of us could swear the earth had moved. Young and old were filled with the audacity of hope. )
Then someone turned the lights on.
Once in power the populist ditched the disguise and became what he had always been -- a slick talking snake-oil salesman who'd no more "walk with unions" than have tea with Assad. Say one thing. Do another. Lie in between. Help rebuild Baghdad but dodge on Detroit. Bail out banksters but bail on homeowners. Escalate wars of aggression. Expand drone killings. Give more tax breaks to the wealthy. Offer cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medical.
<snip>
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Vote-for-Hillary-Can-t-Ge-by-BK-Faunce-Budget_Culture_Democrat_Democratic-141005-480.html?show=votes#allcomments
This sums things up pretty well I think. Basically, America is f$^ked unless we can break this cycle of being force fed candidates by Wall St.
All I can think is Run Bernie Run! He'll have my vote...how about yours?
Face it. Presidential elections are a charade. A kabuki to fool the masses. Dej- vu all over again. And again. And again. And again.
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"...I would rather vote for a Republican..." oooo K... Can we count you as a person who'll BELEIVE
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#9
I didn't miss it. There's a reason you don't like Bernie and it's not the one you're throwing out.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#18
Yeah, you actually did miss it because you're blinded by your preconceived notions that anybody
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2014
#36
There we have it. "He's too extreme" which means he's un-electable, so let's not even try.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#41
If always being a Democrat is your criterion, you've just ruled out both Hillary and Warren.
merrily
Oct 2014
#103
Can you name a republican that holds that position? If not, then that is pure hyperbola
still_one
Oct 2014
#28
If that happened they wouldn't be a republican anymore, at least by present definition. Would
still_one
Oct 2014
#56
The stand I'm taking is that I will support anyone that is truly far left, regardless of label.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#132
S/he'd be lucky to name a Democratic politician who holds all those positions.
merrily
Oct 2014
#102
Actually, this is a site that supports the Democratic Party, to elect MORE Democrats, and
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2014
#38
Well, I'm not so arrogant to I believe that the Democratic Party is solely a liberal Party,
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2014
#50
I couldn't stay on DU during the 2008 presidential primaries. Too contentious.
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2014
#117
But that argument is BS, and I think you know this, because Bernie said he would change to D..
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#17
So why the rabid dislike of Bernie? No one has declared they are running yet as a Democrat.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#23
Don't know if we don't try. Bernie's position are all extremely popular with most Americans.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#51
Well, considering 60-80% of the ENTIRE country agrees with Bernie, it shouldn't be that hard.
Dawgs
Oct 2014
#91
Don't need it. I could care less what defenders of the status quo have to say. nt
NorthCarolina
Oct 2014
#22
Remember Jerry Brown being the last man standing before Clinton won the nomination?
brewens
Oct 2014
#6
What if another Clinton wins the presidential primaries? Will you support them
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2014
#40
Most of my response stemmed from your pretentious opinion on middle school language.
stillwaiting
Oct 2014
#140
No, I want freedom of choice, but I want some good choices to pick from.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Oct 2014
#148
Worse than appeasers in my opinion. They have every intention of doing what they do.
stillwaiting
Oct 2014
#111