Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(150,945 posts)
18. Well, yes. That is fortunate, but that is the reality of Ebola.
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 01:21 PM
Oct 2014

Containment measures, if implemented properly, will prevent a widespread outbreak. Fortunately, in the US, we're equipped to do that. There was a lot of uniformed panic about this at first, but if you looked closely at how it was handled, the containment process was handled neatly and efficiently.

The healthcare providers are another group that will have to be monitored, but if their protective measures are followed well, there shouldn't be any of them who get infected. It's just not a disease that is impossible to protect against.

Again, though, we are very likely to have a few more isolated cases pop up. The CDC is at the MSP airport here, meeting planes that may have people who have traveled from the affected area. There aren't many of them to meet, though. They have passenger manifests, courtesy of the airlines, too, and know the nationalities of every passenger.

If some person does develop it here, they will likely have been spotted and will be followed through the incubation period.

Frankly, I'm not particularly concerned.

Now, I'm heading out to get my flu shot. I'm 69, so I"m getting the quadruple dose one.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nothing sells like fear. Nothing. arcane1 Oct 2014 #1
Winner, winner, chicken dinner. n/t trotsky Oct 2014 #9
Because the media needs an audience, and the majority of that audience is stupid. Avalux Oct 2014 #2
Because that's what they do, elleng Oct 2014 #3
When you have only 3 hours of news and a 24 hour day, you get "re mer gawd" coverage. NutmegYankee Oct 2014 #4
further. why are we not acknowledging that one person brought it in, and it appears seabeyond Oct 2014 #5
Let's hope none of the contacts contract Ebola. MineralMan Oct 2014 #6
Every day that goes by without a second infection is excellent. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #7
I agree that it is an incident, but perhaps one that shows we might not really logosoco Oct 2014 #10
Looks to me like we did know what to do. MineralMan Oct 2014 #12
I believe we are fortunate that Ebola is difficult to transmit. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #15
Well, yes. That is fortunate, but that is the reality of Ebola. MineralMan Oct 2014 #18
Thanks for the reminder. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #20
I don't know. Part of me is still skeptical. logosoco Oct 2014 #21
IF this was an airborne type of virus with an r 0 factor of 2, it would be bedlam. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #13
Dallas is not in the clear until 42 days pass from his hospital admission. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #8
Incubation is 2-21 days. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #11
The area will not be considered free of Ebola until two full incubation periods have passed. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #16
Okay. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #17
Not for anybody who is doing the watching and waiting. For the isolated folks, yes. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #19
Well, for the general public, it'll be time to give a sigh of relief. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #22
Because fear sells media uppityperson Oct 2014 #14
Because ramping up the hysteria media butters their bread theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's been twelve days sin...»Reply #18