Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Restrictions"? Yes, I do. Greater scrutiny is a restriction. Checking for symptoms is, as well. NYC_SKP Oct 2014 #1
Agree, completely. 2banon Oct 2014 #12
I would support travel restrictions to/from anywhere in the midst of a dangerous epidemic like this. stevenleser Oct 2014 #2
Thanks for posting this customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #3
One of the few things you've ever said that I agree with. Excellent points. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #34
Well, you know what they say customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #44
hahahaha!! kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #45
I said oppose PAProgressive28 Oct 2014 #4
Pass. The question is too broad. MineralMan Oct 2014 #5
It would depend on how detectable ebola is in early stages.......... wandy Oct 2014 #6
I can imagine restrictions that I would support, ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #7
"...dehumanizing and terrible..." customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #10
I have never considered being sick as dehumanizing, ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #11
Well, the Repukes customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #14
People in that state , would not be likely to travel much SoCalDem Oct 2014 #16
That's why customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #18
But only if it does not cost any of their precious money SoCalDem Oct 2014 #19
Oh, when it comes to war customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #21
++++++++++++++++ uppityperson Oct 2014 #25
You. Do. Not. Bleed. From. Every. Orifice. In. Your. Body. uppityperson Oct 2014 #24
How is that relevant. branford Oct 2014 #32
If "dead is dead", then according to you being killed in a car wreck is the same. uppityperson Oct 2014 #38
You missed my point. branford Oct 2014 #41
Thank you. And you missed mine, that accurate information is necessary uppityperson Oct 2014 #46
Oh, if you live long enough (highly unlikely), that DIC will have bloody virus-laden fluid oozing kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #35
I have taken care of people with DIC and that is wrong. From every pore in your body? uppityperson Oct 2014 #36
When the capillaries fall apart it does happen. Maybe human skin is different enough from dog skin. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #40
My quick search of Ebola symptoms turned up the following customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #47
I never made the claim ebola is like "ordinary cold or flu". uppityperson Oct 2014 #48
Shock and organ failure do indeed kill customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #49
Does seem like most people are fear based. ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #42
I see absolutely nothing "dehumanizing" about TexasMommaWithAHat Oct 2014 #53
Like I said, I can imagine restrictions I would be OK with. ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #54
Yes, like 30 day waits for visas TexasMommaWithAHat Oct 2014 #55
If I were a legislator, ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #56
I favor sensible "restrictions" over an outright regional "ban" rocktivity Oct 2014 #8
Like the "back in 10 minutes" signs on store door? SoCalDem Oct 2014 #20
Anyone who wants to buy a ticket gets the first test rocktivity Oct 2014 #37
None at all. FLPanhandle Oct 2014 #9
So hard to contract? former9thward Oct 2014 #23
"Without additional interventions or changes in community behavior" is the point uppityperson Oct 2014 #26
Tell that to all the doctors and health care people who have died. former9thward Oct 2014 #28
wtf? The vast majority of people who have caught it were caregivers for others already sick. uppityperson Oct 2014 #30
The question is too broad, needs to be more specific as "restrictions" has a wide range uppityperson Oct 2014 #13
Panic is not a strategy. nt geek tragedy Oct 2014 #15
Prevention is not panic. PADemD Oct 2014 #51
It depends. Can't answer your poll. Avalux Oct 2014 #17
It really depends. branford Oct 2014 #22
Oppose cwydro Oct 2014 #27
what would the poll look like the u.s. were the epicenter of the ebola outbreak? unblock Oct 2014 #29
We might not think about it, but the rest of the world certainly would. Savannahmann Oct 2014 #39
+1000 PADemD Oct 2014 #50
Restrictions, yes: much improved screening, perhaps mandatory followup or at least more kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #31
It does not appear there is any reason to do that treestar Oct 2014 #33
I basically agree. branford Oct 2014 #43
Do you shoot down planes leaving West Africa? JoePhilly Oct 2014 #52
Both the infectious and the contaigous must be kept from traveling from Ebola-affected countries rocktivity Oct 2014 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you favor or oppose tr...»Reply #52