Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reorg

(3,317 posts)
125. I ask myself if there is anything rational about your
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 09:20 PM
Oct 2014

fact-free posts in this very thread?

So, Naomi Wolf wants to know more about those videos than we have been told. Big deal, but this very idea seems so incendiary to you that you go on to write some pretty abusive posts.

Perhaps you shouldn't rely on petty little hit pieces on the web like the one in your OP and read what Naomi Wolf actually wrote?

A commentator below self-identified as being the New York Times reporter covering the hostage crisis. This reporter asked me to take my post about asking for confirmation of the hostage story down, as this reporter said that keeping it up is "irresponsible" and not respectful to the pain of the families involved.

The reporter wrote that there has been a news blackout requested of media for the last two years and that the abductions were known for two years to news outlets, who were respecting the blackout. The reporter also said that it is common for people in conflict areas to go from the military to nonprofit work.

So I have taken the post down pending more reporting of the questions, at which point I will include the new reporting and repost it with the new information included. I asked the reporter to contact me at info@naomiwolf.org, first so I can confirm this is indeed the New York Times reporter who is covering the hostage crisis, and second because, as I wrote back, we still have several unanswered questions we have been putting to the New York Times for some weeks about this story.

First: it is helpful for us to know that there was a news blackout, according to this commentator/reporter (I gather that was reported). But it raises more questions -- if there was a news blackout that protected the hostages for the last two years, how are news outlets not endangering them by reporting so widely on the crisis now?

https://www.facebook.com/naomi.wolf.author/posts/10152722827149476


I remember many abductions in the Middle East over the decades, but not one where a "news blackout was requested of the media". The media would certainly not report on or know every detail of the negotiations, but I never heard about any total news blackout on abductions before. So, yes, it would be interesting to learn more about that aspect, too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree with the author's assessment: Cooley Hurd Oct 2014 #1
puts her looney-tunes claim that the Obama administration coordinated the OWS crackdown in its geek tragedy Oct 2014 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Scuba Oct 2014 #11
But other than evidence, you got *nothing* MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #15
Snort. Scuba Oct 2014 #45
There is no evidence. nt geek tragedy Oct 2014 #77
These are not the droids you are looking for. nt MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #79
No one cites to actual evidence when peddling that geek tragedy Oct 2014 #82
But she was being weird and self-promoting in other ways around OWS starroute Oct 2014 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Scuba Oct 2014 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Oct 2014 #76
My brief googling did not turn up multiple, reliable sources for this claim. I'll delete my posts. Scuba Oct 2014 #92
Cheers. nt geek tragedy Oct 2014 #93
See my post below, you were correct, the attacks on OWS were coordinated at a Federal sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #114
Wrong, FOIA documents proved the Federal Coordination against OWS from the beginning. sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #113
Thanks. Sorry I didn't find this earlier. Scuba Oct 2014 #115
Agreed -- but it's Wolf's inserting herself into the issue that's the problem starroute Oct 2014 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Oct 2014 #66
WHAT!?!?!?!?! How can that....that's a regular greek tragedy I tell you! lol EX500rider Oct 2014 #99
It has been established that federal resources were used and that the banks were involved GoneFishin Oct 2014 #23
It has been claimed by conspiracy peddlers, not geek tragedy Oct 2014 #67
Wrong, again. FOIA documents have proven the Federal Coordination to crackdown on OWS. sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #116
Silly CT nonsense Egnever Oct 2014 #127
Maybe you should have read more of them. There is no question that the attacks on OWS were Federally sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #129
Federal assets and the financial sector both crushed OWS. This has already ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #47
No, it got cold and people had to go to school... snooper2 Oct 2014 #48
OK, so mass hysteria is responsible for these images...gotcha... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #52
If there were plenty where did they go? Police did crack down hard in some cities, snooper2 Oct 2014 #54
Lame. ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #56
Occupy should have had top three things to force the conversation snooper2 Oct 2014 #57
Just mocking without knowing what you are talking about, hunh? Hissyspit Oct 2014 #60
1.) That's not true. 2.) It's not what people are talking about. Hissyspit Oct 2014 #61
True and I think the biggest problem is that there were intentionally no leaders and no end date karynnj Oct 2014 #89
Yeah. They could not weather the blizzard of cops in riot gear. nt GoneFishin Oct 2014 #100
^^^^ This ^^^^ Tarheel_Dem Oct 2014 #106
Really? To say you are wrong is not really necessary for anyone who knows the facts. So I won't sabrina 1 Oct 2014 #130
It has been claimed as fact by people on the Internet. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #68
Damn, what's with so many people losing it like this? OneGrassRoot Oct 2014 #3
you can trace it back to the Clinton administration where conspiracy theories got play in much geek tragedy Oct 2014 #4
Just an FYI, This is Wolf, Not Klein. Two different Naomi's. nt adirondacker Oct 2014 #6
Thanks, I fixed that. I do that a lot with those two, unfortunately. :( n/t OneGrassRoot Oct 2014 #7
thanks for the clarification. i was picturing klein. eom ellenfl Oct 2014 #101
I think you answered your own question: ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #50
The internet, wonderful as we know it is, may be one factor in this karynnj Oct 2014 #98
I think you're correct, karynnj... OneGrassRoot Oct 2014 #103
The following nastiness was a "conspiracy," too, until recently declassified documents came to light blkmusclmachine Oct 2014 #5
Look, just because one can find instances where there were actual conspiracies cali Oct 2014 #8
Maybe Naomi Wolf is part of the conspiracy CJCRANE Oct 2014 #9
Homo Sapien Sapien coexisted with Homo Sapien Idaltu who coexisted w/ Neanderthal for a time. loudsue Oct 2014 #10
I read about this yesterday,I had no idea she sufrommich Oct 2014 #12
As The King says, nuttier than a squirrel's turd AngryAmish Oct 2014 #13
These guys wouldn't lie to us: MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #14
Your post and others in that vein, flat out disgust me. Do you have a clue how callous you are? cali Oct 2014 #19
*I'm* conflating Obama and Bushco? MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #22
yes. you are doing just that. take your red herrings cali Oct 2014 #25
For how long have you known them and their parents? MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #26
One has to personally know people to object to conspiracy loons treating their tragic loss geek tragedy Oct 2014 #33
Personally? I think they were murdered. MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #37
Michael Weiner Savage agress with you snooper2 Oct 2014 #49
So you would refuse to criticize those who claim Clapper geek tragedy Oct 2014 #70
You Better Believe It! nt msanthrope Oct 2014 #119
This post is not Greenwald Manny, it's Infowars/rense.com Manny. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #29
So Clapper doesn't have a history of lying MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #34
no, it's a red herring used to obfuscate the current subject geek tragedy Oct 2014 #36
So Clapper and company lied *last* time, MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #38
This story has nothing to do with Clapper. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #69
Where do you think Clapper - and by extension our government - MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #78
No, Manny, Wolf really is in the same category as Sandy Hook truthers muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #80
They are not relevant to this story. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #81
There is no way that lie could be promulgated. It would involve cali Oct 2014 #83
What do you mean it isn't about Clapper!!!!!! NCTraveler Oct 2014 #88
That's a horribly American-centric point of view muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #41
I haven't heard about Naomi's thoughts on the beheadings smiley Oct 2014 #16
Are the grieving parents and spouses part of the act? sufrommich Oct 2014 #18
and there's only a fucking shitload of evidence that these were real people cali Oct 2014 #20
I can't shake the feeling that these events CJCRANE Oct 2014 #28
You were right to keep this to yourself. Suggesting that the victims are part of a fraud geek tragedy Oct 2014 #31
What is your opinion of "the Jersey Girls"? CJCRANE Oct 2014 #35
That was different. MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #39
They were not peddling clinically insane bullshit geek tragedy Oct 2014 #75
Proud of them, and view them as entirely differently geek tragedy Oct 2014 #71
Once you distinguish "the Jersey Girls" from 9/11 Truthers hack89 Oct 2014 #85
They still have about 300 questions CJCRANE Oct 2014 #96
I know hack89 Oct 2014 #97
She's also a regular guest on the Alex Jones show. sufrommich Oct 2014 #17
what makes me want to vomit is the callous dog shit cali Oct 2014 #21
I have zero tolerence for people who believe sufrommich Oct 2014 #24
Have you read the full 9/11 report? CJCRANE Oct 2014 #27
Naomi Wolf is loony tunes CJCRANE Oct 2014 #30
What are the real and relevant questions you are referring to? DanTex Oct 2014 #51
Is a British Jihadi killing journalists CJCRANE Oct 2014 #55
I see the beheadings as having the same effect as the attacks of 9/11. The ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #58
yes, it's just like pearl harbor. zappaman Oct 2014 #84
You fail, as usual. And I'm still here despite the best efforts you are capable of... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #87
perhaps you would be so kind as to explain how this is "a new pearl harbor" zappaman Oct 2014 #109
I'm still here! Hahahahahahahaa! you can't get rid of meeeeeee....!!!111!11 ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #110
nothing, eh? zappaman Oct 2014 #112
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2014 #86
I agree that those are real and relevant questions. DanTex Oct 2014 #59
The redacted pages CJCRANE Oct 2014 #62
of course. that's totally reasonable, but it's not the topic and it's nothing close to cali Oct 2014 #65
Who says the victims have to be fake for right wing chicken hawks to be behind GoneFishin Oct 2014 #32
this really isn't rocket science: Being targeted by The U.S. is great for recruitment cali Oct 2014 #46
I agree with you.... KoKo Oct 2014 #63
Wolf not N Klein ! lunasun Oct 2014 #107
Absolutely...I have corrected.. Just read environmental article by Klein... KoKo Oct 2014 #117
Hmmm...She seems mostly to be asking that journalists do their job and verify. (I have no doubts.) WinkyDink Oct 2014 #40
not even close. and she's one of the shoddiest writers around and always has been cali Oct 2014 #64
I liked "The Beauty Myth." And her "The Shock Doctrine" I should probably read. WinkyDink Oct 2014 #90
I thought the Beauty Myth was lacking- not particularly insightful. She didn't write the Shock cali Oct 2014 #94
Oops! WinkyDink Oct 2014 #102
Wolf not N Klein ! lunasun Oct 2014 #108
no, actually, you are a very shoddy reader reorg Oct 2014 #124
Naomi Wolf at Ron Paul Rally... SidDithers Oct 2014 #42
Recommended. H2O Man Oct 2014 #53
JFC at some of the responses. NuclearDem Oct 2014 #72
No different than the Sandy Hook Truthers. nt geek tragedy Oct 2014 #74
I "unfollowed" her on facebook a few years back, she annoyed me. m-lekktor Oct 2014 #73
I followed links to Vox a couple of times... MattSh Oct 2014 #95
Naomi has entered "death panel" territory. I'm pondering what her DU handle might be. Tarheel_Dem Oct 2014 #104
Another journalist who simply asks for rational thinking is thrown under the bus Corruption Inc Oct 2014 #105
She threw herself under, screaming "only I know the Real Truth!" muriel_volestrangler Oct 2014 #118
a) that is not what she is doing. not at all. b) there's nothing rational about her. cali Oct 2014 #121
I ask myself if there is anything rational about your reorg Oct 2014 #125
I find these conspiracy theories distasteful and i don't buy them. hrmjustin Oct 2014 #111
Someone was going to hop on the bandwagon sooner or later Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #120
This message was self-deleted by its author Teamster Jeff Oct 2014 #122
Oh, I read "Naomi Wolf"... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2014 #123
Cuz the CIA/MIC/USA has never and would never Zorra Oct 2014 #126
not quite as accomplished as Naomi Wolf, the author of that little hit piece reorg Oct 2014 #128
I'm such a sucker for Naomi Wolf aikoaiko Oct 2014 #131
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The insane conspiracy the...»Reply #125