Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The insane conspiracy theories of Naomi Wolf [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)125. I ask myself if there is anything rational about your
fact-free posts in this very thread?
So, Naomi Wolf wants to know more about those videos than we have been told. Big deal, but this very idea seems so incendiary to you that you go on to write some pretty abusive posts.
Perhaps you shouldn't rely on petty little hit pieces on the web like the one in your OP and read what Naomi Wolf actually wrote?
A commentator below self-identified as being the New York Times reporter covering the hostage crisis. This reporter asked me to take my post about asking for confirmation of the hostage story down, as this reporter said that keeping it up is "irresponsible" and not respectful to the pain of the families involved.
The reporter wrote that there has been a news blackout requested of media for the last two years and that the abductions were known for two years to news outlets, who were respecting the blackout. The reporter also said that it is common for people in conflict areas to go from the military to nonprofit work.
So I have taken the post down pending more reporting of the questions, at which point I will include the new reporting and repost it with the new information included. I asked the reporter to contact me at info@naomiwolf.org, first so I can confirm this is indeed the New York Times reporter who is covering the hostage crisis, and second because, as I wrote back, we still have several unanswered questions we have been putting to the New York Times for some weeks about this story.
First: it is helpful for us to know that there was a news blackout, according to this commentator/reporter (I gather that was reported). But it raises more questions -- if there was a news blackout that protected the hostages for the last two years, how are news outlets not endangering them by reporting so widely on the crisis now?
https://www.facebook.com/naomi.wolf.author/posts/10152722827149476
The reporter wrote that there has been a news blackout requested of media for the last two years and that the abductions were known for two years to news outlets, who were respecting the blackout. The reporter also said that it is common for people in conflict areas to go from the military to nonprofit work.
So I have taken the post down pending more reporting of the questions, at which point I will include the new reporting and repost it with the new information included. I asked the reporter to contact me at info@naomiwolf.org, first so I can confirm this is indeed the New York Times reporter who is covering the hostage crisis, and second because, as I wrote back, we still have several unanswered questions we have been putting to the New York Times for some weeks about this story.
First: it is helpful for us to know that there was a news blackout, according to this commentator/reporter (I gather that was reported). But it raises more questions -- if there was a news blackout that protected the hostages for the last two years, how are news outlets not endangering them by reporting so widely on the crisis now?
https://www.facebook.com/naomi.wolf.author/posts/10152722827149476
I remember many abductions in the Middle East over the decades, but not one where a "news blackout was requested of the media". The media would certainly not report on or know every detail of the negotiations, but I never heard about any total news blackout on abductions before. So, yes, it would be interesting to learn more about that aspect, too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
puts her looney-tunes claim that the Obama administration coordinated the OWS crackdown in its
geek tragedy
Oct 2014
#2
My brief googling did not turn up multiple, reliable sources for this claim. I'll delete my posts.
Scuba
Oct 2014
#92
See my post below, you were correct, the attacks on OWS were coordinated at a Federal
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#114
Wrong, FOIA documents proved the Federal Coordination against OWS from the beginning.
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#113
Agreed -- but it's Wolf's inserting herself into the issue that's the problem
starroute
Oct 2014
#91
WHAT!?!?!?!?! How can that....that's a regular greek tragedy I tell you! lol
EX500rider
Oct 2014
#99
It has been established that federal resources were used and that the banks were involved
GoneFishin
Oct 2014
#23
Wrong, again. FOIA documents have proven the Federal Coordination to crackdown on OWS.
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#116
Maybe you should have read more of them. There is no question that the attacks on OWS were Federally
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#129
Federal assets and the financial sector both crushed OWS. This has already
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#47
If there were plenty where did they go? Police did crack down hard in some cities,
snooper2
Oct 2014
#54
True and I think the biggest problem is that there were intentionally no leaders and no end date
karynnj
Oct 2014
#89
Really? To say you are wrong is not really necessary for anyone who knows the facts. So I won't
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#130
you can trace it back to the Clinton administration where conspiracy theories got play in much
geek tragedy
Oct 2014
#4
Thanks, I fixed that. I do that a lot with those two, unfortunately. :( n/t
OneGrassRoot
Oct 2014
#7
The following nastiness was a "conspiracy," too, until recently declassified documents came to light
blkmusclmachine
Oct 2014
#5
Homo Sapien Sapien coexisted with Homo Sapien Idaltu who coexisted w/ Neanderthal for a time.
loudsue
Oct 2014
#10
Your post and others in that vein, flat out disgust me. Do you have a clue how callous you are?
cali
Oct 2014
#19
One has to personally know people to object to conspiracy loons treating their tragic loss
geek tragedy
Oct 2014
#33
No, Manny, Wolf really is in the same category as Sandy Hook truthers
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#80
You were right to keep this to yourself. Suggesting that the victims are part of a fraud
geek tragedy
Oct 2014
#31
I see the beheadings as having the same effect as the attacks of 9/11. The
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#58
You fail, as usual. And I'm still here despite the best efforts you are capable of...
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#87
I'm still here! Hahahahahahahaa! you can't get rid of meeeeeee....!!!111!11
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#110
of course. that's totally reasonable, but it's not the topic and it's nothing close to
cali
Oct 2014
#65
Who says the victims have to be fake for right wing chicken hawks to be behind
GoneFishin
Oct 2014
#32
this really isn't rocket science: Being targeted by The U.S. is great for recruitment
cali
Oct 2014
#46
Hmmm...She seems mostly to be asking that journalists do their job and verify. (I have no doubts.)
WinkyDink
Oct 2014
#40
I liked "The Beauty Myth." And her "The Shock Doctrine" I should probably read.
WinkyDink
Oct 2014
#90
I thought the Beauty Myth was lacking- not particularly insightful. She didn't write the Shock
cali
Oct 2014
#94
Naomi has entered "death panel" territory. I'm pondering what her DU handle might be.
Tarheel_Dem
Oct 2014
#104
Another journalist who simply asks for rational thinking is thrown under the bus
Corruption Inc
Oct 2014
#105