Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Too Big to Jail? Obama at the top of bankster fraud. [View all]valerief
(53,235 posts)29. How would you know? You must go to those sites. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
295 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'd perfer this article since it outlines the timeline that the Democrats pushed through TARP
Historic NY
Oct 2014
#23
Octa.....my memory is that McCain and one of the bushes was involved with Keating fraud...
dixiegrrrrl
Oct 2014
#158
That goes to the exact point of the OP. This White House -- all of them -- "have us on ignore"
villager
Oct 2014
#58
you are right about that. we have no representation except for the rare case where the
whereisjustice
Oct 2014
#139
Our minders are *slowly* realizing there's some overlap with "climate change" now
villager
Oct 2014
#179
Nobody gives a shit who you have on ignore, especially the poster you're addressing. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#219
He makes a big scene about how he has Octafish on ignore but he somehow knows
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#221
Well it's telling more when people cannot bear to look at what the opposition says
treestar
Oct 2014
#206
Everybody already knows what to expect from those other sites. So, you go there too? nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#222
I don't go to any of them, ever. I see enough right-wing crap right here on DU. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#233
So, you read my appeal to GOTV as hope that we will lose? I am not at all surprised considering....
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#238
You better believe it! And I don't happen to have my zappaman file with me. Now...
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#245
So, you said something about me being a banned DUer in one of my deleted posts?
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#248
You're the one who is confused, zappy. You asked if your accusation was in one of my
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#252
How the fuck do you know what's on those sites? Just visiting here? nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#220
Still stalking me, eh? Give me a minute. I'm going to list all the posts you've
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#253
"When will we stop hearing this canard? ".. when "we" stop avoiding the question? tia
uponit7771
Oct 2014
#72
And that administration wouldn't have prosecuted the banksters either........
SammyWinstonJack
Oct 2014
#159
Not really. Besides, the USSC is too important to allow any Republican president
tblue37
Oct 2014
#26
First you have to trust that a Dem POTUS will place a SCJ that is for the real people.
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#28
Sotomayor and Kagan are better by far than the RWers on the USSC right now. And
tblue37
Oct 2014
#41
No one ever has to vote for anyone. We supported this president because we thought
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#99
If we could agree on your statement as a party, or even DU, we could have actual discussion
BrotherIvan
Oct 2014
#106
The ODS network doesn't want to know about the "70%" or how much good President Obama has done
Cha
Oct 2014
#157
We've been down this road countless times, though, haven't we? It's pointless.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2014
#294
Corporate owned socially progressive warmonger or Corporate owned batshit crazy winger <Sigh> eom
Tommymac
Oct 2014
#156
It's like Scorpio talking about his battles with the mouth breathing cretins on Discussionist
Number23
Oct 2014
#162
Exactly, this is just anothe Obama hate fest thread which seems to appear all to frequently here
still_one
Oct 2014
#188
Obama told the banks he was the only thing standing between them and our pitchforks.
Autumn
Oct 2014
#9
It is as was said the other day: "The new American Dream is to be a slave to a billionaire." n/t
xocet
Oct 2014
#189
Not be repeatedly mischaracterizing it as a circular firing squad, that's for sure
RufusTFirefly
Oct 2014
#68
For some silly reason the line so you want McCain/ Palin just doesn't work anymore
Autumn
Oct 2014
#89
The "lesser of evils" meme is so last year. The people eating at soup kitchens, getting a few days
rhett o rick
Oct 2014
#187
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CF4QFjAI&url=http
stupidicus
Oct 2014
#48
Yes, that's where we are now. Question is, what will "the people" do about it?
polichick
Oct 2014
#63
Well ...we can't all be banksters so I guess we are stuck with our pathetic votes.
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#173
Anyone who voted for Obama in 2012 even when they really didn't like his policies after the first 4 years
NYC Liberal
Oct 2014
#73
We bought into that crap that if we don't vote for a D the republicans will win.
Autumn
Oct 2014
#95
There's a Senate seat race in Kansas where the Dem pulled out and an Independant is leading
Electric Monk
Oct 2014
#111
So why don't you promote someone you admire instead of coming on a Democratic forum...
randome
Oct 2014
#94
Wow, that is the full list, 1SBM. Wash, rinse, repeat to infinity, just as Segretti would.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#190
should be a crime to evoke Eugene Debs for an election month hit job to convince dems not to vote
certainot
Oct 2014
#143
...because republicans are the only ones who fuck us over. Enjoy your delusion.
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#227
i'm well aware of what the corporate wing and blue dogs and liebermans are doing
certainot
Oct 2014
#235
If the truth suppresses the vote then that's just too bad. Do lies suppress or swing the vote? Yep!
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#289
the rush actions are a great start, but it's the only thing the last 25 years
certainot
Oct 2014
#295
IMO liberals and progressives embarrass the centrists so they lash out. They know they...
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#290
Well we had to 'look forward' because McCain/Rmoney..........or something like that.
SammyWinstonJack
Oct 2014
#152
Sadly, inaction on bankster reform came from the top, the White House. Someone got paid back by
blkmusclmachine
Oct 2014
#176
No disagreement, nothing changed under Obama, but policy is still set from the top. n/t
slipslidingaway
Oct 2014
#285
He'll likely get a prime spot at the Carlyle Group or Goldman-Sachs for his efforts n/t
BuelahWitch
Oct 2014
#239