General Discussion

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)

8. This is not mutual excluding of what I suggest

Sat Apr 14, 2012, 01:20 PM

Apr 2012

You can do both. If you're depending on elections, recall that there has just been gerrymandering for the states after the biggest Republican victory in 80 years. They are now entrenched in safe districts. We also have the computerized election machines tabulating elections, and these are easily hacked and cheated. Repubs also work to suppress the vote, with measures that might just be effective.

Therefore, don't look for big election victories anytime soon. You better consider taking other measures, too, such as the ones I've suggested.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AZ's abortion law & My wistful advice to fellow Pro-choicers [View all] caseymoz Apr 2012 OP

If the state is going to mandate births, will it become liable for Downwinder Apr 2012 #1

Of course not. caseymoz Apr 2012 #2

To my way of thinking, the woman should be able to sue the state Downwinder Apr 2012 #3

I agree. caseymoz Apr 2012 #4

Being from Az, I have to disagree. What I think needs to be done is for jillan Apr 2012 #5

This is probably the most sensible response of all, jillan. calimary Apr 2012 #6

This is not mutual excluding of what I suggest caseymoz Apr 2012 #8

What do you mean I'm "bashing" the states? caseymoz Apr 2012 #7

About this "perinatal hospice" thing; who's paying for this? MrScorpio Apr 2012 #9

Yes. Anti-choicers would call it a necessary evil. caseymoz Apr 2012 #10