Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Forty-Year Hissy Fit (Why “Republicanism” is doomed) [View all]hifiguy
(33,688 posts)23. Nixon was an anomaly, and strange even for that.
Nixon didn't really have a huge agenda other than "not losing" in Vietnam and doing everything possible to advance the interests of one Richard M. Nixon, the law and the costs be damned. If this required he be seen as a "statesman", fine. If it required stealing an election he would have won anyway, fine. Whatever he was, and that question could be debated for years, Nixon was not an ideologue. He was a congenitally cheap, crooked ward-heeling pig raised to a high exponential power by way of the presidential office.
He did invent the modern slash-and-burn, scorched earth Repuke political campaign style, however, and they have been in use, refined to an even higher degree by Rove and company, ever since.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exactly. Of course, there were yesterday's Southern Democrats, most of today's "tea partiers"...
Hortensis
Oct 2014
#44
yesssss: it's *unmoored* anger that they've been cultivating for so long (that also helps explain
MisterP
Oct 2014
#11