Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bodhi BloodWave

(2,346 posts)
29. my understanding is that he got it
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 02:30 PM
Oct 2014

primarily for his efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation and climate change, and his support for using established international bodies such as the United Nations et al.

Now i do understand the basis of the 'not bush' mentality to some degree since part of the reason was also that the committee considered him to have demonstrated a willingness to engage in diplomacy rather then though talk and such(which is the aspect i think many of his critics regarding the prize focus on).

I think he deserved it based on the above, but I also agree with Obama himself that there likely were more worthy candidates then himself(with all that said i honestly think he would have gotten the prize even if he had lost the bid for the presidency since what i consider to be the core of the reasoning were things he had been working on even before running ).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Tip of the hat to Sweden. cheapdate Oct 2014 #1
As someone with Swedish relatives... Rhinodawg Oct 2014 #2
I haven't the slightest but I feel compelled to ask, who? Phlem Oct 2014 #5
It's good to see other countries chiming in on this situation. Chemisse Oct 2014 #3
You mean they don't trust a country run by a man with a Nobel Peace Prize? hughee99 Oct 2014 #4
Why use that as a snide attack? he deserved the prize based on the reasoning for the award n/t Bodhi BloodWave Oct 2014 #26
Didn't he get it for not being George Bush? (nt) mr blur Oct 2014 #27
my understanding is that he got it Bodhi BloodWave Oct 2014 #29
Good for them! Xolodno Oct 2014 #6
Maybe they should explain their policies treestar Oct 2014 #7
The RT article appears to indicate that the US has not commented substantively on Sweden's actions. branford Oct 2014 #12
From a larger Al-Jazeera article... ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #18
I stand corrected (the RT article was very poorly written). branford Oct 2014 #20
Sweden is the ninth country to recognize Palestine. ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #21
I don't see how such a strategy really works. branford Oct 2014 #24
Those are good points. ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #25
Recognition of the State of Palestine does not necessarily equal peace. branford Oct 2014 #28
Of course, but pressure can help. ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #30
They did, but the RT article didn't cover the story very well. ZombieHorde Oct 2014 #19
I suppose that now Sweden is considered unAmerican and part of the Axis of Evil. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2014 #8
I think the reaction in most of America is, ">>yawn,<< pass the remote control . . ." branford Oct 2014 #14
Good for them. liberal_at_heart Oct 2014 #9
Thank you Sweden malaise Oct 2014 #10
Sanctions on Sweden will surely follow after the media buildup misinforming folks about the Fred Sanders Oct 2014 #11
Sweden is Un-American. Enthusiast Oct 2014 #13
Good. I wonder what the global tally is on this issue? toby jo Oct 2014 #15
Here go you.... Violet_Crumble Oct 2014 #23
Let's take a cue fron Sweden... Mister Nightowl Oct 2014 #16
But Assange thinks Sweden is a US puppet state... SidDithers Oct 2014 #17
Oh that's right! treestar Oct 2014 #22
One nation (American in the past 70 years) Dawson Leery Oct 2014 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'US Won’t Decide Our Poli...»Reply #29