General Discussion

OilemFirchen

(7,288 posts)

46. Of course I don't know you.

Tue Oct 7, 2014, 05:22 PM

Oct 2014

I do know, however, that in this instance you've cited the work of a man who approaches economics from a Libertarian perspective in order to bolster a ridiculous claim. His ultra-free market approach taints every "analysis" he makes, including the one you've cited.

I also understand that you're terribly, horribly, awfully disappointed in the current President. That explains why you possess no shame when you determine whose works you promote, no matter how reactionary and/or ridiculously flawed.

Did I miss anything?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Leon Panetta, other former Obama subordinates show stunning disloyalty [View all] n2doc Oct 2014 OP

In other news, Panetta likes money and realizes that loyalty just doesn't pay. el_bryanto Oct 2014 #1

You said it flamingdem Oct 2014 #8

^^THIS^^ 2naSalit Oct 2014 #9

Eeyup. It's as simple as that. hifiguy Oct 2014 #31

I was about to post my own OP on this. Literally yelling at the radio bullwinkle428 Oct 2014 #2

Fact Bobcat Oct 2014 #6

CNN just had a foaming repuke going on about that talking point flamingdem Oct 2014 #10

heck, Obama tried to undo the SOFA any way he could MisterP Oct 2014 #30

Along those lines: Panetta's a fucking liar-- TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #18

Very important post. H2O Man Oct 2014 #27

Thanks! I thought I remembered him saying that...but KoKo Oct 2014 #35

Not surprised JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #3

Panetta invited movie producers to a classified briefing and revealed the names of the TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #16

Panetta's with the Program: War is good for the economy. Octafish Oct 2014 #4

Oh good! OilemFirchen Oct 2014 #33

Do you think I agree with him? Octafish Oct 2014 #41

Um... yes. OilemFirchen Oct 2014 #43

Then you don't know me. Octafish Oct 2014 #45

Of course I don't know you. OilemFirchen Oct 2014 #46

Let me be clear, then. This President is why America today is run by warmongers and traitors! Octafish Oct 2014 #50

I wasn't questioning your bona fides. OilemFirchen Oct 2014 #51

That's why I bothered to answer. Octafish Oct 2014 #55

Wasn't he one of the Cabinet officers that advised against the bin Laden raid? bigbrother05 Oct 2014 #5

hmm--Panetta would make a fantastic running mate for Hillary. librechik Oct 2014 #7

He's as old as McCain. They could be the geriatric ticket. TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #14

I think you are onto something there.... KoKo Oct 2014 #21

This kind of thing sucks for the Midterms flamingdem Oct 2014 #11

Panetta's a Democrat? hootinholler Oct 2014 #12

Panetta Robbins Oct 2014 #13

Was there any doubt that this man is just a Hillary toady? TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #15

Panetta has always been a fool. Most of Obama's subordinates have been diasters. (nt) bigwillq Oct 2014 #17

Well, he never was Obama's guy in the first place. Tatiana Oct 2014 #19

But... KoKo Oct 2014 #24

What constitutes a "rival"? Political parties? Just people who hate each other? TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #28

Different political philosophies, mostly. Tatiana Oct 2014 #34

Obama's not running for anything, so criticizing him will not be damaging in any future elections. Nye Bevan Oct 2014 #20

Some would disagree with you n2doc Oct 2014 #29

Are you suggesting that it is less disgusting for a cabinet official to criticize Obama than Hillary karynnj Oct 2014 #47

he's currently on m$nbc with andrea mitchell...they're having a grand time spanone Oct 2014 #22

This may sound like H2O Man Oct 2014 #23

Who got Osama Bin Laden again? Maybe someone needs to remind Leon. Rex Oct 2014 #25

They lean whichever way the money blows. nt valerief Oct 2014 #26

We don't want government based on loyalty to an individual DavidDvorkin Oct 2014 #32

He's not in government. His time to express his concerns about TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #36

Well said. H2O Man Oct 2014 #37

Thanks. TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #38

Of course he should have spoken out then, but that's irrelevant DavidDvorkin Oct 2014 #42

Exactly and the same goes for Hillary Clinton -- even more karynnj Oct 2014 #48

Yes--once you decide to go along with something, and agree to promote and defend it TwilightGardener Oct 2014 #49

By Jove, I think he's got it! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #54

First we had Hillary throwing both President Obama & Secretary Kerry under the bus...and now this. PragmaticLiberal Oct 2014 #39

"The interview was timed with this week�s launch of Panetta�s book" KamaAina Oct 2014 #40

very disappointing lack of class -- on both their parts. MBS Oct 2014 #44

"The interview was timed with this week�s launch of Panetta�s book . . ." Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #52

He has a book to sell, controversy sells... Spazito Oct 2014 #53

So much for Chomsky, Hedges, Assange, Scahill, Greenwald and the rest of that lying lot. ucrdem Oct 2014 #56

ugh whadda douche AtomicKitten Oct 2014 #57

I posted a duplicate of this thread Mister Nightowl Oct 2014 #58

Looks like this meme has officially crashed and burned. nt ucrdem Oct 2014 #59