Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uppityperson

(116,022 posts)
129. There is no way to stop all cases. Current restrictions have told 77 people the can't fly, 1 exposed
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 10:28 PM
Oct 2014

person who became ill has managed to pass without being caught. Here are no direct flights, people must transfer leading to at least 2 flight possibly infected, and the connecting airport. How many people have caught ebola from a traveler coming to the USA? None, right? Though to be fair we are waiting on Mr Duncan's family who livd for days in that contaminated apartment. Though to be fair again, people on floghts do not eperience that if those showing symptoms are barred from flying.

Continue to screen people by observation, looking at their temperature and for other symptoms indicating illness or contagiousnss, use a better questionaire.

The person you agree with advocated shooting down airplanes with potentially ill people on them, as well as shooting dead anyone fromLiberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea if they tried to cross their borders. They ended up calling those of us who oppose quarantining an entire country racist. Do you really agree with them?



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How do you plan to enforce this? sharp_stick Oct 2014 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #71
OMG republicans now want the federal government involved Skittles Oct 2014 #75
LOL. Nice gotcha. JimDandy Oct 2014 #94
Awww I missed him sharp_stick Oct 2014 #113
just another fucking moron Skittles Oct 2014 #124
Exactly meadowlark5 Oct 2014 #128
ebola could have been contained more quickly in Africa were it not for those slashed budgets Skittles Oct 2014 #134
True. And it also could have been contained if people had treated it as serious as a heart attack, Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #146
There are no flights from those 3 countries that land on the USA. If there were, shoot them down? uppityperson Oct 2014 #89
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #97
No, there are not direct flights. Show me the links to prove there are. uppityperson Oct 2014 #99
From what I have been reading, they are no direct flights to the U.S. JimDandy Oct 2014 #90
How much do we pay customs officials to make sure that no one comes into the US with a bag of pot? Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #140
I think it's time for the plastic sheeting and duct tape!!! msanthrope Oct 2014 #2
Duck and cover! greatauntoftriplets Oct 2014 #3
I'm telling ya'....everyone's watched too many zombie movies. nt msanthrope Oct 2014 #6
Everyone knows that doesn't work Control-Z Oct 2014 #38
They always took us into the hall, away from all the windows. greatauntoftriplets Oct 2014 #40
I could post my Game Over Man, Game Over, video 10 times a day. n/t FSogol Oct 2014 #5
And some stock footage of the citizens of Tokyo fleeing Godzilla....nt msanthrope Oct 2014 #10
+1 Go Vols Oct 2014 #11
Is your anthrax vaccine current? nt msanthrope Oct 2014 #14
West African Countries like Brussels, Dallas, and Spain? FSogol Oct 2014 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #61
One guy flying into Nigeria infected upwards of 20 more before they got a handle on it. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #141
Nope. The only way is to sen lots of money, people, resources to deal with the outbreak so it uppityperson Oct 2014 #7
yup. La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2014 #8
I agree. The only other thing that might help some is that we the people voluntarily limit travel to jwirr Oct 2014 #30
an idea does not have to be racist to be stupid and unfeasible. La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2014 #9
no it pretty much is all three. Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #17
Extremist nonsense attributing that to the OP. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #24
Yes the op is extremist nonsense. Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #32
Yes, because the ONLY way we can help sick people over there is to allow them to vacation here. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #142
Nigeria had restrictions. But the suggestion Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #148
Nigeria was a clusterfuck, and they barely got it under control. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #153
What Texas can learn from Nigeria when it comes to containing Ebola Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #154
I will agree that it's a massive relief that it's not out of control now in Lagos or Port Harcourt. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #155
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Oct 2014 #12
Actually, the CDC issued a level 3 nonessential travel alert yesterday. PADemD Oct 2014 #144
Yeah, that'll work. MohRokTah Oct 2014 #13
Is Spain in West Africa? LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #15
No it isn't. But thanks for deciding that millions of people not even near an infected area should Warren Stupidity Oct 2014 #16
Thanks! Someone needs to point out some things to people. MineralMan Oct 2014 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #59
THOSE PEOPLE Skittles Oct 2014 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #73
LOL Skittles Oct 2014 #76
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #80
OH but repukes certainly don't want to pay the taxes needed for such "PROTOCOLS" Skittles Oct 2014 #82
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #87
I'm surprised there was no outrage here about what the Rude Pundit pposted notadmblnd Oct 2014 #109
he's making fun of overreaction Skittles Oct 2014 #125
See anything wrong with this photo? What is important? countryjake Oct 2014 #65
expect to hear some Faux News talking points, countryjake! Skittles Oct 2014 #77
He sure was persistent, shooting down sick people (or jets) for the greater good ... countryjake Oct 2014 #137
OMG Skittles Oct 2014 #157
Really? I think republicans should be required to greet all passengers of flights notadmblnd Oct 2014 #81
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #85
Boy, you read into that exactly what you wanted to didn't you? notadmblnd Oct 2014 #88
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #91
There are no direct flights, so how or why ban nonexistent thing? uppityperson Oct 2014 #95
+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2014 #98
There are no direct flights so why ban something that does not exist? uppityperson Oct 2014 #111
No, of course not. I would just favor restrictions on flights out of those countries to any country smirkymonkey Oct 2014 #118
77 people have been stopped from flying by the screenings, 17 last month, of thousands who flew uppityperson Oct 2014 #120
I am not sure I get your point. smirkymonkey Oct 2014 #123
There is no way to stop all cases. Current restrictions have told 77 people the can't fly, 1 exposed uppityperson Oct 2014 #129
Oh, no. Of course I don't agree with them. Maybe I responded to the wrong person. smirkymonkey Oct 2014 #167
Are you intentionally ignorant about ebola? Today is day 11 since Thomas Duncan was hospitalized notadmblnd Oct 2014 #105
Don't worry. It's a "black" disease, you know. MineralMan Oct 2014 #18
It's a scary one scarystuffyo Oct 2014 #50
You're getting a lot of curt responses. I disagree with you but what you are talking about stevenleser Oct 2014 #19
Did you forget that we've sent troops there to do humanitarian work? MineralMan Oct 2014 #21
The military will use military transport to and from West Africa. n/t JimDandy Oct 2014 #33
Yes, and what difference does that make? MineralMan Oct 2014 #34
Your question read like you were asking HOW we would get our military JimDandy Oct 2014 #41
Sorry if I was unclear. MineralMan Oct 2014 #43
Will they be quarantined by themselves with no outside contact for 3 wks when they return? uppityperson Oct 2014 #37
Luckily, in this day and age, we have many ways for family to stay in contact with them JimDandy Oct 2014 #45
We should let troops and other healthcare professionals in, however there should smirkymonkey Oct 2014 #102
CDC Director just said 840high Oct 2014 #131
Respectfully disagree. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #22
" Only an effective intervention by international health authorities will." Exactly! uppityperson Oct 2014 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #57
Common sense is not the same thing as geek tragedy Oct 2014 #60
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #69
You said, "As for the 99.9% who don't have it, that's just too bad." countryjake Oct 2014 #74
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #78
How humane of you... countryjake Oct 2014 #79
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #83
Medical assistance, people have their own means of transport? Hahahaahahaha. Fail. They fly uppityperson Oct 2014 #86
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #93
MSF and WHO are amateurs in dealing with diseases where the us military is not? Hahahahaha uppityperson Oct 2014 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #101
You make too much sense. smirkymonkey Oct 2014 #92
you mean the racist troll? noiretextatique Oct 2014 #121
Do you really think a travel ban will keep it from crossing borders? geek tragedy Oct 2014 #100
again..presupposing that Ebola is only spread by those flying out of that country? Sheepshank Oct 2014 #112
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #115
Why be selective? Why not all areas where there have Downwinder Oct 2014 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #66
we certainly already know what you are Skittles Oct 2014 #70
I found these two points as to why that's not a great idea to be interesting. herding cats Oct 2014 #25
It can't be effectively done. Agschmid Oct 2014 #26
Your suggestion reminds me of that lockdown in the Monrovia slum... countryjake Oct 2014 #27
Your OP is offensive. nt MADem Oct 2014 #28
I'm puzzled by the premptive defense against accusations of racism... Cali_Democrat Oct 2014 #36
Indeed. nt MADem Oct 2014 #42
I'm not that puzzled, really. MineralMan Oct 2014 #51
Are you REALLY puzzled? Really? Number23 Oct 2014 #127
I'm not puzzled - DU 840high Oct 2014 #132
So, have you thought about this a little more since starting the thread? MineralMan Oct 2014 #29
I doubt they thought about it initially! Nt Logical Oct 2014 #53
Well, enough to try to fend off people who might think racism MineralMan Oct 2014 #54
A defintate hit and run post! Nt Logical Oct 2014 #56
Frankly, I was more than a little surprised by it. MineralMan Oct 2014 #58
I wasn't surprised at all. nt MADem Oct 2014 #139
You're channeling Elisabeth Hasselbeck...and that's not a good thing: Cali_Democrat Oct 2014 #35
If they don't control it soon, I can see a 21-day isolation policy kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #39
You're behind the times re: UK. Your animal quarantine information is WAY out of date. MADem Oct 2014 #47
Well it's been over ten years since I needed to prep a cat to go to the UK. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #49
They switched to a home quarantine not too long after the chunnel opened (five years or so), IIRC. MADem Oct 2014 #63
The laws did change but it was not due to the chunnel goldent Oct 2014 #165
It was six years after the chunnel opened that the law changed, and the push to change the law MADem Oct 2014 #170
You do realize that would only make things worse, not better Hugabear Oct 2014 #44
Route private aid supplies and personnel JimDandy Oct 2014 #67
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #114
.... Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #46
Perfect. nt Cali_Democrat Oct 2014 #48
Simple and to the point. MineralMan Oct 2014 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #119
Post and run??? Nt Logical Oct 2014 #55
EEEEE Bole Ahhhh! Feral Child Oct 2014 #64
This would not work, even just due sadoldgirl Oct 2014 #68
So people who are not ill are effectively held prisoner? alarimer Oct 2014 #72
That IS what a quarantine type of ban is for... JimDandy Oct 2014 #84
jury results... ProdigalJunkMail Oct 2014 #103
Indeed. I served on that one too. #7 missed the point entirely. arcane1 Oct 2014 #106
Wow...no wonder you won't come back and comment. Rex Oct 2014 #104
Care to bet whether she tries to pretend in the future that this thread had never even existed? Electric Monk Oct 2014 #110
This message was self-deleted by its author Iggo Oct 2014 #107
You do realize what will happen if you try to do that right? dilby Oct 2014 #108
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #116
wow, according to some, I am a racist.... boston bean Oct 2014 #117
Well, well, well. Welcome to the club BB The Straight Story Oct 2014 #130
Well well well boston bean Oct 2014 #133
I was a victim of that spurious labeling. nt MADem Oct 2014 #135
I was falsely attacked a few times, too. So yeah, it does suck. nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #162
I don't think yr a racist, but I can see why the thread wandered down that path... Violet_Crumble Oct 2014 #147
+1 Thanks for linking to that Washington Post piece. countryjake Oct 2014 #152
First off, 4 people agree with you. Second, I don't think you are a racist. Rex Oct 2014 #163
Embarrassing. Marr Oct 2014 #122
It's more of a "facts be damned" attitude, I suspect. nt MADem Oct 2014 #126
Well this thread did bring out "name removed" neverforget Oct 2014 #136
I agree. Borders are already closed, and that has worked to keep it contained to 3 main countries Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #138
What a fecking stupid idea. Nt arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #143
Not stupid, according to the CDC and the UK government. PADemD Oct 2014 #145
Warning people against nonessential travel to arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #149
Not many people can afford PADemD Oct 2014 #151
Do you understand that the land borders around those countries are already closed? Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #156
Closing off getting aid, supplies and medical arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #158
And Senegal has opened up a humanitarian air bridge. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #159
I consider vacationers non essential travellers arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #161
I think we all have the same goal. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #166
Agreed. I see a lot of fear and we need to arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #168
I've been paying attention to this since April. Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #169
I totally agree but some if what I've seen as arthritisR_US Oct 2014 #171
Well, chew on this: Who are some of the largest constituencies in our party? Public employees- Warren DeMontague Oct 2014 #172
I think the way to handle the problem is to get the right medical equipment gollygee Oct 2014 #150
Well..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2014 #160
I'm going to trust that the CDC has this one under control Hippo_Tron Oct 2014 #164
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's time to prevent publ...»Reply #129