General Discussion

MrScorpio

(73,775 posts)

9. About this "perinatal hospice" thing; who's paying for this?

Sat Apr 14, 2012, 03:22 PM

Apr 2012

Last edited Sat Apr 14, 2012, 04:45 PM - Edit history (1)

That is, if some abnormal fetus actually makes it to term, survives AND doesn't kill the mother?

What if the fetus is found to be abnormal after the 18th week of pregnancy deadline?

Assuming that the mother wanted the child in the beginning anyway, but changes her mind based on a fetal abnormality, why is the state of Arizona INTENTIONALLY making originally wanted pregnancies that develop into pregnancies that requiring medical intervention more dangerous and unnecessary?

This is insane and inhumanly cruel.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AZ's abortion law & My wistful advice to fellow Pro-choicers [View all] caseymoz Apr 2012 OP

If the state is going to mandate births, will it become liable for Downwinder Apr 2012 #1

Of course not. caseymoz Apr 2012 #2

To my way of thinking, the woman should be able to sue the state Downwinder Apr 2012 #3

I agree. caseymoz Apr 2012 #4

Being from Az, I have to disagree. What I think needs to be done is for jillan Apr 2012 #5

This is probably the most sensible response of all, jillan. calimary Apr 2012 #6

This is not mutual excluding of what I suggest caseymoz Apr 2012 #8

What do you mean I'm "bashing" the states? caseymoz Apr 2012 #7

About this "perinatal hospice" thing; who's paying for this? MrScorpio Apr 2012 #9

Yes. Anti-choicers would call it a necessary evil. caseymoz Apr 2012 #10