Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama and ENDA: How about helping him get it passed? [View all]
Lots of disappointed people these days with the President over his not signing an executive order than would bar discrimination against gay and lesbian workers in federal contractors, and I'm one of them. True, this one executive order doesn't fix everything the actual ENDA law would, but it would at least be something, right?
However, the administration has said again and again that an EO would not be effective enough for the President's goals, and from what I'm seeing, it might even be counter productive. From the 4/12 press briefing:
Again, I think that the DADT repeal is instructive here in terms of the approach that were taking at this time. And while it is not our usual practice to discuss executive orders that may or may not be under consideration, we do not expect that an EO on LGBT non-discrimination for federal contractors will be issued at this time. We support, as I just said, legislation that has been introduced -- the Employment Non-Discrimination Act -- and we will continue to work with congressional supporters to build -- sponsors, rather, to build support for it.
What that paragraph says when you read between the lines is that the opposition to the President signing an EO on LGBT non-discrimination for federal contractors is coming from Congress. Jay Carney is being as politic as possible in saying it, but it's right there. There's an approach that's similar to the DADT repeal (another situation where an EO was held back at the request of Congress so they could get the votes together for the repeal). Here, it's the same thing.
So if you want an EO, call your Congress critters and find out who's the holdup. If you can't change their mind, you can at least get them on the record as to why they oppose an EO for federal contractors. Is ENDA broadly popular among the American populace? Is the limited EO? Great! Tell them that. Have your facts and your polls in line and cite them in your letters and your calls.
Or alternately, you could be working to implement the plan of ENDA's sponsors as described by Carney:
Were deeply committed to working hand-in-hand with partners in the LGBT community on a number of fronts to build the case for employment non-discrimination policies including by complementing the existing body of compelling research with government-backed data and analysis, building a coalition of key stakeholders and decision-makers, directly engaging with and educating all sectors of the business community -- from major corporations to contractors to small business -- and raising public awareness about the human and financial costs of discrimination in the work force.
Tell your stories of discrimination in the work force. Tell the ones you've experienced and the ones you've observed. Talk about the human and financial costs to everyone who will listen -- most especially in letters or phone calls to your Congress critters. But do it here as well, in this thread, in other threads, on Facebook, in family meetings, wherever you can find an audience willing to listen, and maybe a few not that willing as well!
Get into a local gay rights group and find out what you can do to advance the legislation. If you can help complement the existing body of compelling research, do that! Talk to business leaders about who they hire and who they fire.
Every minute spent resenting President Obama for not signing a band-aid EO is a minute wasted. Do you want to end all the discrimination for good? Or do you want to hate on Obama, the only 2012 major party candidate who would sign ENDA the minute it hits his desk? Which is going to get us down the road to ENDA faster?
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exactly...another attempt to absolve Obama from any reponsbility from anything
joeybee12
Apr 2012
#12
What do you think the national LGBT lobby has been doing for the last twenty years?
ruggerson
Apr 2012
#4
That's my Senator, Jeff Merkely, and I worked hard for Jeff's election. This is why.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2012
#9
I'm happy to listen to you on these issues when you're talking real solutions. n/t
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#13
The real solution is for Obama to sign the limited EO and keep the ball rolling on ENDA
ruggerson
Apr 2012
#15
That's one, but it's clear the White House is saying signing the EO will hurt the ENDA coalition.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#16
Yes, there is a reason. They don't want a gay issue to come up during campaign season
ruggerson
Apr 2012
#25
But President Obama talks about his accomplishments in gay rights and his plans all the time.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#27
Gay issues will come up in the campaign. Romney will be anti-gay, Obama will kick him in the nuts
emulatorloo
Apr 2012
#40
People on BBI threads are virulently opposed to BBI's incessant Obama bashing.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#21
Two kinds of neg responses in that thread, anti-BBI and Strategical Differences w BBI about how to
emulatorloo
Apr 2012
#41
Frank is one of 72 Housemembers who have sent a letter to Obama requesting he sign the EO
ruggerson
Apr 2012
#24
"But prominent members of House Democratic leadership aren’t among the signers."
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#26
"There are conservative Democrats in the House who are also weasels on gay rights."
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#29
Also, 72 members aren't even a majority of Democratic members of the House.
Bolo Boffin
Apr 2012
#38
And no one listens - he must stop the firings that he can now - these are real people
FreeState
Apr 2012
#36